1977
DOI: 10.1016/0077-7579(77)90010-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mycale micracanthoxea nov. spec. (porifera, poecilosclerida) from the Netherlands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sponges of the Netherlands were the subject of a number of scientific studies in the recent past: van reporting 15 marine species; Buizer & van Soest (1977) reassigning a previously reported species to a species new to science. This was later on done also for a species previously identified as Prosuberites epiphytum (Lamarck, 1814), which was found to be an obligate Australian epiphyte of algae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sponges of the Netherlands were the subject of a number of scientific studies in the recent past: van reporting 15 marine species; Buizer & van Soest (1977) reassigning a previously reported species to a species new to science. This was later on done also for a species previously identified as Prosuberites epiphytum (Lamarck, 1814), which was found to be an obligate Australian epiphyte of algae.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Material described below and all other collected specimens (together belonging to approximately 100 species) have been equally divided between three institutions: the Zoologisch Museum Amsterdam (ZMA), the British Museum (Natural History) London (BMNH), and the Zoologisk Museum K(Ilbenhavn (ZMUC), where they have been incorporated in their respective sponge collections. Methods employed in dealing with the specimens are the same as described in BUiZER & VAN SOEST (1977).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section and spicule mounts for light microscopic study were made according to methods described by Riitzler (1978). SEM preparations of spicules were made as described by Buizer & Van Soest (1977). "In toto" SEM preparations were treated with 20% HNOj for 3-12 h, after which they were coated with a thin layer of gold.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%