My joint pain: Web-based osteoarthritis management resource improves quality of care

Umapathy, Hema; Bennell, K.L.; Dickson, Chris; Dobson, Fiona; Fransen, Marlene; Jones, Graeme; Hunter, David J.

doi:10.1016/j.joca.2015.02.996

Cited by 2 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We also evaluated the responsiveness for single item pass rates with three hypotheses for each item considering acceptable responsiveness if !2 of 3 hypotheses were confirmed. Based on evidence for the effectiveness of OA interventions measured with QIs 12,21,22 , we hypothesized that the OA patient education programme would affect the change scores from T2 to T3 only for the items related to information or advice (e.g., items no. 1e4, 6 and 14).…”

Section: Responsivenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement properties for the revised patient-reported OsteoArthritis Quality Indicator questionnaire

Østerås

Tveter

Garratt

et al. 2018

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Responsivenessmentioning

confidence: 99%

Measurement properties for the revised patient-reported OsteoArthritis Quality Indicator questionnaire

Østerås

Tveter

Garratt

et al. 2018

Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Patients would also benefit from learning about past experiences from former patients, allied health staff or clinicians. Furthermore, gamification elements in DHI design and progress tracking, as alluded to in one study, 31 may also extend patient-DHI engagement to increase the chances of lasting positive effects. DHIs appear to be an accepted part of treatment across other surgical fields, 43 with timing, delivery and the future addition of peer support networks seeming important in promoting positive health behaviour change.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The four other studies 26,[28][29][30] either developed their own visual material or used a third-party company to create it. Four studies 21,23,25,31 used a website, with one study developing an e-learning platform with educational videos. 23 One study used a text messaging system.…”

Section: Digital Health Intervention Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Content included anatomy, pathology, pathogenesis of osteoarthritis, treatment options for osteoarthritis, preparation for surgery, the surgical procedure, expectations of outcomes, in-hospital activities, analgesia, expectations, postoperative recovery and exercises, limitations and restrictions, prevention of complications and signs and symptoms of infection, as well as guidance for when to seek help. Seven studies [22][23][24]26,27,31,33 utilized interviews with patients, allied health professionals or surgeons.…”

Section: Contentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Seven studies [22][23][24][25][26][27][28] were randomized controlled trials, three [29][30][31] were quasi-experimental, two were prospective, 32,33 and one 21 was a descriptive single arm study. There were a total of 1802 participants.…”

Section: Study and Patient Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The role of digital health interventions to improve health literacy in surgical patients: a narrative review in arthroplasty

Davaris

Bunzli

Trieu

et al. 2022

ANZ Journal of Surgery

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Arthroplasty is a high-volume but costly treatment option for advanced osteoarthritis. Health literacy and patient education are modifiable factors that can improve patient outcomes in arthroplasty. Digital technologies show potential as an instrument for providing patients with reliable information. This narrative review aimed to identify the current evidence for how effective digital health interventions (DHIs) are in targeting health literacy and related constructs (including knowledge, decision-making and self-efficacy) in arthroplasty. Methods: Six databases were searched for published studies comprising health literacy and related constructs, arthroplasty, and DHIs. The main outcome measure was health literacy. Two reviewer-authors independently screened studies according to predefined inclusion criteria and performed data extraction. Data was analysed and summarized in tabular and narrative form. Results: Two thousand seven-hundred and sixty-four titles and abstracts were screened. One hundred and sixty-seven papers underwent full-text analysis. No studies used health literacy as an outcome measure; therefore, the outcome measure was broadened to include its constructs, and the full-text analysis was repeated. Thirteen studies were included. No study following a structured design for their DHI. Eleven studies demonstrated participant improvement in constructs of health literacy, including knowledge, decision-making and self-management. Conclusion: Current evidence suggests digital technology may provide new means of educating patients and improving aspects of their health literacy. More research digital technology with a structured approach, framework and standardized measures is required. Welldesigned digital technology may become a useful adjunct to future patient care.

show abstract

My joint pain: Web-based osteoarthritis management resource improves quality of care

Cited by 2 publications

References 0 publications

Measurement properties for the revised patient-reported OsteoArthritis Quality Indicator questionnaire

Measurement properties for the revised patient-reported OsteoArthritis Quality Indicator questionnaire

The role of digital health interventions to improve health literacy in surgical patients: a narrative review in arthroplasty

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About