Co-speech gesture use can be influenced by both cognitive factors (e.g., proficiency in a language, cognitive resources) and cultural factors (e.g., as high-gesture-frequency cultures). Both of these sets of factors could affect gesture use among bilinguals. For the purposes of this chapter, we use "bilingual" to refer to any person who has fluency in two languages, even if they are not highly proficient in one of them. Bilinguals differ from monolinguals on both cognitive factors and cultural factors, in ways that could be related to gesture use.Bilinguals differ from monolinguals (and from each other) on some cognitive factors, in particular, language proficiency and cognitive resources. Both of bilinguals' languages are continually active and accessible (Chee, 2006;Crinion et al., 2006;Kroll et al., 2006). Bilinguals must therefore inhibit the activation of one language in order to speak the other. The necessity of inhibition may be part of the reason that bilinguals have a harder time accessing words for speaking than monolinguals (Gollan & Acenas, 2004;Yan & Nicoladis, 2009). Gestures could play an important role in bilinguals' language access, in particular when their proficiency in the target language is weak.One function of gestures is to lighten the load on working memory (Cook et al., 2012). Working memory is the dedicated system thought to underlie the processes responsible for thinking, speaking, and problem solving (Baddeley, 2003). Some components of working memory involve the ability to merely store and retrieve information as presented; other components are inextricably linked with executive functions (Baddeley, 2003). Krauss et al. (2000) laid out an explicit framework for the relationship between working memory and gesture production. They argued that information contained in long-term memory can be encoded in different representational formats. For example, for the word "house," a person may have numerous visual and verbal representations of this concept. According to Krauss et al., when one of these representational formats is activated in working memory, this can activate related concepts in other representational formats. When thinking about the visual layout of one's home, this could activate the verbal representations of "house" or "home." Relying on this framework, the activation of visuospatial working memory (e.g., the imagistic representations of house) tends to give rise to gesture production, and the activation of verbal working memory (e.g., the lexical representations of house) tends to give rise to speech articulation. According to this perspective, representational gestures-gestures that represent the referent through shape or movementcan facilitate speech production by cross-modally priming the lexical affiliate during the formulation of speech (Krauss et al., 2000). Difficulties in activating the relevant