2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2022.01.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MWFP-outlier: Maximal weighted frequent-pattern-based approach for detecting outliers from uncertain weighted data streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6(a). In contrast, other methods have achieved lower rates, which are 71.87%, 70.63%, 73.22%, 88.03%, 90.16%, 93.81%, and 84.32% of the recall measure for the methods UKOF [14], MWFP-Outlier [15], LiCS [21], iLDCBOF [22], Method in [26], Method in [27], and ASEC-OD [28], respectively. One thing is notable here is that the MWFP-Outlier and LiCS methods have the lowest performance rates on all datasets in most cases.…”
Section: E Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…6(a). In contrast, other methods have achieved lower rates, which are 71.87%, 70.63%, 73.22%, 88.03%, 90.16%, 93.81%, and 84.32% of the recall measure for the methods UKOF [14], MWFP-Outlier [15], LiCS [21], iLDCBOF [22], Method in [26], Method in [27], and ASEC-OD [28], respectively. One thing is notable here is that the MWFP-Outlier and LiCS methods have the lowest performance rates on all datasets in most cases.…”
Section: E Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The proposed framework is evaluated by comparing results with its standalone base learners and other some predictive machine learning techniques such as Logistic Regression (LR), SVM, GaussianNB, K-NN, Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Gradient Boosting, and Local Outlier Factor (LOF). In addition, ESOD is compared with many state-ofthe-art methods found in [14], [15], [21], [22], [26], [27], and [28]. We individually show the performance of the comparisons on the aforementioned 11 datasets using the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score metrics.…”
Section: E Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations