2017 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference (UPEC) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/upec.2017.8231860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

MVAC submarine cable, impedance measurements and analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following, the results presented in [29] for the C1 cable are employed for evaluating the performance of the SUSM regarding the computation of the total losses, series impedance and induced sheath current as a function of frequency. Then, the measurements obtained in [30], [31] for the C2 cable are later considered for this evaluation in terms of resonant frequencies and harmonic impedances.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the following, the results presented in [29] for the C1 cable are employed for evaluating the performance of the SUSM regarding the computation of the total losses, series impedance and induced sheath current as a function of frequency. Then, the measurements obtained in [30], [31] for the C2 cable are later considered for this evaluation in terms of resonant frequencies and harmonic impedances.…”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this sense, since these cables are specifically built on a projectby-project basis, it is difficult for the academia to have access to a piece of cable for testing purposes. So, few research studies are available providing experimental measurements derived from a frequency-domain analysis on real TCACs [29]- [31], being simulations tools, like the USM, a valuable alternative for the analysis and design of TCACs, supplementing costly experimental setups. Having all this in mind, this paper goes a step further by proposing a simplified ultrashortened 3D-FEM model (SUSM) to reduce the simulation time during frequency-domain analyses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the problem of loss allocation in three-core armored cables (TCACs) has been tackled during the last 10 years, either in the form of new analytical formulations (for sheath and armor losses) [6,7], numerical methods, such as the method of moments (MoM-SO) [8], integral methods [9], the finite element method (2D FEM [3,4,10,11], 3D FEM [12][13][14][15][16]), multi-conductor cell [17][18][19] or more experimentally oriented [3,4,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this aim, accurate tools are required to simulate and analyze the complex physics and interactions involved in three-core armored cables, since experimental measurements are costly and only possible for manufacturers. In this sense, numerical simulations based on the finite element method (FEM) have been employed widely in the past [4,6,9,[12][13][14][15][16]. This tool is usually applied to 2D geometries, sometimes representing the armor as a hollow cylinder with appropriate electrical properties to include the presence of gaps between the armor wires [15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, although researchers agree in the need of updating the expressions of the IEC standard, [9,12] report some contradictory results regarding the importance of screen (sheath) over armor losses in the global computation of cable losses. In this sense, [6][7] conclude that armored cables have higher losses than unarmored cables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%