“…Rural communities influence immigrants' lives in various ways. They provide a positive environment, acknowledging immigrants as individuals and fostering connections through shared values (Stenbacka 2012;Sireni 2022). Conversely, social order in small rural settings can be negative, leading to social control, perceiving immigrants as "other", and challenges in assimilating into tightly knit social networks (Haugen & Villa 2006;Stenbacka 2012;Hayfield & Schug 2019;Välimaa 2021).…”
Rural communities frame immigrants’ belonging experiences in various ways. In this article, I examine: 1) how do immigrants produce belonging in their speech through symbolic boundaries in rural areas, and 2) what kinds of belonging do those boundary constructions create? This study contributes to the discussion about belonging in rural areas by highlighting immigrants’ own voices in the process. The empirical data is based on twenty-three semi-structured interviews of immigrants living in rural areas in Finland. As a conclusion, the interviewees created belonging in relation to the safety and stagnancy of rural places, the experience of being (not) understood, and within religion and value systems. Within these three frames, the interviewees highlighted the meaning of employment, language, and social relations with Finnish people as aspects that promoted their sense of belonging. However, rural areas’ structural order offers different opportunities for these three elements of belonging to materialise.
“…Rural communities influence immigrants' lives in various ways. They provide a positive environment, acknowledging immigrants as individuals and fostering connections through shared values (Stenbacka 2012;Sireni 2022). Conversely, social order in small rural settings can be negative, leading to social control, perceiving immigrants as "other", and challenges in assimilating into tightly knit social networks (Haugen & Villa 2006;Stenbacka 2012;Hayfield & Schug 2019;Välimaa 2021).…”
Rural communities frame immigrants’ belonging experiences in various ways. In this article, I examine: 1) how do immigrants produce belonging in their speech through symbolic boundaries in rural areas, and 2) what kinds of belonging do those boundary constructions create? This study contributes to the discussion about belonging in rural areas by highlighting immigrants’ own voices in the process. The empirical data is based on twenty-three semi-structured interviews of immigrants living in rural areas in Finland. As a conclusion, the interviewees created belonging in relation to the safety and stagnancy of rural places, the experience of being (not) understood, and within religion and value systems. Within these three frames, the interviewees highlighted the meaning of employment, language, and social relations with Finnish people as aspects that promoted their sense of belonging. However, rural areas’ structural order offers different opportunities for these three elements of belonging to materialise.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.