1988
DOI: 10.1086/494406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutuality and Marginality: Liberal Moral Theory and Working-Class Women in Nineteenth-Century England

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The economic dependence of women on male wages is socially constructed and can be eliminated only through a total social reorganization that must address not only the economy but also gender-that is, familial and kinship structures and the social division of labor by sex.5 Thus, even though it may start from a position quite critical of liberal individualism, this analysis, too, has as one focus the goal of economic self-sufficiency for women. Barbara Taylor recounted the transformation and bifurcation of nineteenthcentury British utopian socialism into a gender-conscious feminism that was relatively class-blind and a class-conscious socialism that was relatively gender-blind (Taylor 1983; also Smith and Valenze 1988). Similarly, in the contemporary U.S. context, we find analyses that would have women make "independence," rather than collective empowerment, their goal.…”
Section: Downloaded By [Memorial University Of Newfoundland] At 14:32mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The economic dependence of women on male wages is socially constructed and can be eliminated only through a total social reorganization that must address not only the economy but also gender-that is, familial and kinship structures and the social division of labor by sex.5 Thus, even though it may start from a position quite critical of liberal individualism, this analysis, too, has as one focus the goal of economic self-sufficiency for women. Barbara Taylor recounted the transformation and bifurcation of nineteenthcentury British utopian socialism into a gender-conscious feminism that was relatively class-blind and a class-conscious socialism that was relatively gender-blind (Taylor 1983; also Smith and Valenze 1988). Similarly, in the contemporary U.S. context, we find analyses that would have women make "independence," rather than collective empowerment, their goal.…”
Section: Downloaded By [Memorial University Of Newfoundland] At 14:32mentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Through work and marriage, women tied households to one another and to the locality. 69 Domestic self-provisioning and interhousehold exchanges were of themselves probably not reasons for remaining in Southill, but sharing often provided security and impeded social or geographical mobility. 70 Moreover, between 1834 and 1914, a woman could only make a claim for parish relief where she was 'settled' -that is, in the parish of her birth or of her husband's birth.…”
Section: Daniel Weinbrenmentioning
confidence: 99%