2022
DOI: 10.1002/icd.2310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual identification promotes children's generosity

Abstract: From an early age, children act generously towards one another, but the situational features that promote generous decision‐making remain under investigation. The current study tests the impact of being identifiable—as a recipient of generosity, a giver, or both—on children's generosity. Six‐year‐old children (N = 129) allocated resources to a recipient during a video chat paradigm. Children were most generous when both they and the recipient could identify one another (i.e., in the case of mutual identificati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 71 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results build on evidence that reputation-enhancing behavior starts in early childhood (for reviews, see Engelmann & Rapp, 2018; Silver & Shaw, 2018) and are consistent with evidence that young children’s beliefs about other people’s states of knowledge can guide their behavior (Asaba & Gweon, 2022; Fast et al, 2022; Leimgruber et al, 2012), even if no potential evaluators are present (Ma et al, 2020; Rapp et al, 2019). In addition, the present work offers a new way to quantify the effects of social motives and compare them with the effects of other types of motives.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Our results build on evidence that reputation-enhancing behavior starts in early childhood (for reviews, see Engelmann & Rapp, 2018; Silver & Shaw, 2018) and are consistent with evidence that young children’s beliefs about other people’s states of knowledge can guide their behavior (Asaba & Gweon, 2022; Fast et al, 2022; Leimgruber et al, 2012), even if no potential evaluators are present (Ma et al, 2020; Rapp et al, 2019). In addition, the present work offers a new way to quantify the effects of social motives and compare them with the effects of other types of motives.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%