2021
DOI: 10.1111/jfir.12266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual fund performance and changes in factor exposure

Abstract: In this article, we examine whether active mutual funds that markedly change their exposure to systematic risk factors subsequently outperform. We propose a new returns-based approach to assess the degree to which mutual funds adjust their risk exposure, with the benefit of not requiring periodically updated information related to funds' portfolio holdings. Applying this measure to active US mutual funds from 1990 to 2016, we provide evidence that mutual fund managers exhibiting substantial changes in their ri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
(94 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Under this restriction, the constant, αFH ${\alpha }_{F-H}$, represents the pricing error, namely the common return that cannot be explained by the risk factors in ft ${f}_{t}$. According to asset pricing theory, if these risk factors perform well, the intercepts (pricing errors) αFH ${\alpha }_{F-H}$ for all momentum strategies should be (jointly) zero (see Bessler et al, 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under this restriction, the constant, αFH ${\alpha }_{F-H}$, represents the pricing error, namely the common return that cannot be explained by the risk factors in ft ${f}_{t}$. According to asset pricing theory, if these risk factors perform well, the intercepts (pricing errors) αFH ${\alpha }_{F-H}$ for all momentum strategies should be (jointly) zero (see Bessler et al, 2022).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their setting omits relevant risk factors in the benchmarks, which may alter their inferences (Matallín-Sáez, 2006). An alternative timing performance measure is proposed by Bessler et al . (2022) based on a portfolio performance persistence approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, their setting omits relevant risk factors in the benchmarks, which may alter their inferences (Matall ın-S aez, 2006). An alternative timing performance measure is proposed by Bessler et al (2022) based on a portfolio performance persistence approach. They report positive timing ability of US equity fund managers based on the change in the exposure to systematic risk factors during two consecutive and nonoverlapping periods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When all the risk factors are excess returns on traded assets, these timeseries regressions provide a time-series test about the performance of those risk factors in explaining the cross-section of momentum returns with the restriction that the risk premiums are equal to the averages of risk factors. Under this restriction, the constant, α J−K , represents pricing error, namely the common return that can not be explained by the risk factors in f t (see e.g., Bessler et al, 2022) and if these risk factors perform well, the intercepts (pricing errors) α J−K for all momentum strategies should be (jointly) zero, implied by asset pricing theory.…”
Section: Asset Pricing Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%