1996
DOI: 10.1016/s1062-9769(96)90020-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual fund investment performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
30
3
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
10
30
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A one percentage difference in expense ratio is associated with a performance difference of 0.71%. This result is consistent with [2]. However, the regression fit is very poor, i.e., R 2 is close to 0.1%.…”
Section: Ols Results Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A one percentage difference in expense ratio is associated with a performance difference of 0.71%. This result is consistent with [2]. However, the regression fit is very poor, i.e., R 2 is close to 0.1%.…”
Section: Ols Results Analysissupporting
confidence: 86%
“…An increase of 1.0 in turnover would lead to a drop of 1% in returns per year. The negative relation between turnover and fund return is consistent with the Morningstar study [10] and the conventional wisdom, but different from [2].…”
Section: Ols Results Analysissupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fi ndings of Low (2010) also indicate that riskier funds are able to generate higher returns. On portfolio turnover, Dahlquist et al (2000) and Fortin and Michelson (2005) fi nd that it is positively related to fund performance while Ippolito (1989) and Droms and Walker (1996) fi nd no evidence that performance is signifi cantly affected by portfolio turnover. While the aforementioned studies relate fund characteristics to performance, the focus is on the overall fund performance without separating the performance into timing and selectivity components.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Yapılan çalışmalar, genellikle fon performansı ve maliyetleri arasında negatif yönlü ilişki ortaya koymuştur. Bununla birlikte; Droms ve Walker (1996), Amerikan hisse senedi yatırım fonlarının getirilerinin fon büyüklüğü ve devir oranı ile ilişkili olmadığı fakat yüksek getirilerin yüksek gider oranlarıyla ilişkili olduğu sonucunu elde etmişlerdir. Vijayakumar (2012), Hindistan için hisse senedi yatırım fonunun performansı ile fonun standart sapması, büyüklüğü ve gider oranları arasında pozitif yönlü; fonun getirisiyle fonun devir oranı arasında ise negatif yönlü ilişki elde etmiştir.…”
Section: Literatürunclassified