2012
DOI: 10.1021/ja300769j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual Exclusivity in the Synthesis of High Crystallinity and High Yield Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes

Abstract: We report the mutually exclusive relationship between carbon nanotube (CNT) yield and crystallinity. Growth conditions were optimized for CNT growth yield and crystallinity through sequential tuning of three input variables: growth enhancer level, growth temperature, and carbon feedstock level. This optimization revealed that, regardless of the variety of carbon feedstock and growth enhancer, the optimum conditions for yield and crystallinity differed significantly with yield/crystallinity, preferring lower/hi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
16
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(54 reference statements)
4
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4c). In general, this opposing trend is in agreement with previous reports regarding the relation of G/D-ratio and yield 13 . One can conclude from these results that a carbon feedstock with high reactivity requires less input to synthesize a determined amount of CNTs which can result in higher G/D-ratios.
Figure 4Comparisons of the SWCNT structure.(a) Raman G/D-ratio as a function of carbon feedstock concentration.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4c). In general, this opposing trend is in agreement with previous reports regarding the relation of G/D-ratio and yield 13 . One can conclude from these results that a carbon feedstock with high reactivity requires less input to synthesize a determined amount of CNTs which can result in higher G/D-ratios.
Figure 4Comparisons of the SWCNT structure.(a) Raman G/D-ratio as a function of carbon feedstock concentration.
…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The development of scientific research and industrial applications for carbon nanotubes (CNTs) has been primarily limited by its synthesis and as a result, immense research, encompassing the control of the structure and underlying growth mechanism, has been invested over the past two decades to improve growth control, e.g. efficiency 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8 , crystallinity 9,10,11,12,13 and chirality 14,15 . Apt examples include the water-assisted chemical vapor deposition (CVD) method to improve growth efficiency 2 , floating catalyst CVD method to improve crystallinity 11 and catalyst gas pretreatments for metallic selective growth 14,15 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…136,137 To make CNT forests competitive in each application space, targeted growth must advance to hone application-specific properties. Researchers have sought to focus control on one or a few critical characteristics including intrinsic CNT forest properties like crystallinity/defect density, 138,139 wall number, 140−142 diameter (and polydispersity), 143−148 alignment, 149 and areal density. 147,150 Importantly, there are inherent tradeoffs between these characteristics, which limit the extent of independent control and thus should be considered in the application design.…”
Section: Recent Advances In Swcnt Growthmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) can be grown up to millimetre lengths, contain negligible catalytic impurities, and can now be produced commercially at up to the tonne-scale annually. 9 The diameter of SG-CNTs varies from 2-5 nm, controlled by the amount of catalyst deposited; below around 3 nm, as used in this study, the majority are single wall nanotubes. 10 As-synthesised, SWCNTs generally form bundles, due to their high surface energy, which are mechanically and electronically inferior to the ideal individualised species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%