2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual development in mass collaboration: Identifying interaction patterns in customer-initiated software product development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we adopted a social network analysis approach to identify the interactions between students and teachers across the 4 weeks of online discussion. The analysis showed that some students (i.e., S13, S3, S29, and S14) were very active across the 4 weeks hence being regarded as information brokers or bridge builders [1,8]. Moreover, some weeks recorded more interactions than others (i.e., week 2, 3 and 4).…”
Section: General Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…First, we adopted a social network analysis approach to identify the interactions between students and teachers across the 4 weeks of online discussion. The analysis showed that some students (i.e., S13, S3, S29, and S14) were very active across the 4 weeks hence being regarded as information brokers or bridge builders [1,8]. Moreover, some weeks recorded more interactions than others (i.e., week 2, 3 and 4).…”
Section: General Discussion and Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More importantly, most of the previous studies are limited to the description of social networks, without analysis of the discourse dimensions of these interactions. However, the combination of social network and discourse analysis of students' artefacts could allow for a more nuanced description of student engagement and learning [1,21], and necessary to reach an overall interpretation of such complex dynamics generated among students [10]. From this background, this study aims to explore the potential of SLA (i.e.…”
Section: Identified Gaps and Research Questionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Li and Gu (2015) proposed an OSN link formation model from the perspective of user behavior, which reproduced degree distribution, clustering and degree correlation of OSN [56]. Andersen and Mørch (2016) classified user types through social network statistical analysis and constructed "user-topic" hybrid network with user interaction analysis of user posts [57]. Baumgartner and Peiper (2017) extended a novel method called stochastic block modeling to derive communities of cannabis consumers as part of a complex social network on Twitter [58].…”
Section: Research Methods Of Consumer Online Communitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, if student S8 posted a message in response to S10's post, we coded it as (S8èS10). Following the SNA measures used in previous studies (Andersen & Mørch, 2016), we used degree centrality measures to determine the number of ties an individual student actor had with other student actors in the network (Smith et al, 2009). Moreover, we used betweenness centrality to identify the students occurring within the shortest path between other nodes, which represented other students, who thus facilitated the spread or control of information within the network.…”
Section: Social Network Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%