2016
DOI: 10.1109/tap.2016.2535540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual Coupling Reduction for High-Performance Densely Packed Patch Antenna Arrays on Finite Substrate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 108 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Defected ground structures (DGSs), such as periodic rectangular slits [12], back-to-back U-shaped slots [13], T-shaped slots [14], and loop slots [15] have also been used. More recently, numerous metamaterial-inspired structures have been considered, such as folded single split ring resonators [16], grounded split-ring resonators (GSRRs) [17], multiple split-ring resonators (MSRRs) [18], complementary split-ring resonators (CSRRs) [19], elliptical split-ring resonators (E-SRRs) [20], embedded circuit (EC) resonators [21], capacitively loaded loop (CLL) resonators [22], waveguide-based resonators [23], composite metamaterials [24][25] [26,27], double-layer mushroom structures [28], and coplanar strip walls [29]. Several types of transmission lines that directly connect adjacent antenna elements have also been applied to reduce the mutual coupling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defected ground structures (DGSs), such as periodic rectangular slits [12], back-to-back U-shaped slots [13], T-shaped slots [14], and loop slots [15] have also been used. More recently, numerous metamaterial-inspired structures have been considered, such as folded single split ring resonators [16], grounded split-ring resonators (GSRRs) [17], multiple split-ring resonators (MSRRs) [18], complementary split-ring resonators (CSRRs) [19], elliptical split-ring resonators (E-SRRs) [20], embedded circuit (EC) resonators [21], capacitively loaded loop (CLL) resonators [22], waveguide-based resonators [23], composite metamaterials [24][25] [26,27], double-layer mushroom structures [28], and coplanar strip walls [29]. Several types of transmission lines that directly connect adjacent antenna elements have also been applied to reduce the mutual coupling.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is observed that the proposed work provides better isolation enhancement compared to References . It should be noted that the gap between the radiating elements of the array is only 3.4 mm ( λ /10) and it is smaller than References . In Reference , 11 dB coupling improvement has been reported.…”
Section: Mutual Coupling Analysismentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The optimized dimension of the C‐SCSRR unit cell is follows: P x = 2.4 mm, P y = 8.4 mm, L s = 2.2 mm, s = 0.67 mm, D 1 = 2 mm, D 2 = 1.2 mm, w = 0.9 mm. Here, the two double‐ring CSRR structure is combined with the slot structure to miniaturize the unit cell . Due to the mutual reactance between the slots, the double‐ring configuration makes the C‐SCSRR unit cell electrically smaller compare to the single ring structure .…”
Section: Mutual Coupling Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach to decoupling between radiating elements has been studied in many configurations, e.g., [50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66]. However, because any of these implementations would require additional area/volume, they would substantially increase the overall size of the system and, hence, would nullify the intended electrically small result.…”
Section: D Magnetic Ez Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%