1990
DOI: 10.1109/8.56954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutual coupling in a slotted phased array, infinite in E-plane and finite in H-plane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…E DGE effects in finite arrays have been studied through the medium of a finite-by-infinite array [1], [2], where the beam is scanned across the finite dimension of the array. Use of colinear or parallel dipoles in the infinite linear arrays allows -plane or -plane scan [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…E DGE effects in finite arrays have been studied through the medium of a finite-by-infinite array [1], [2], where the beam is scanned across the finite dimension of the array. Use of colinear or parallel dipoles in the infinite linear arrays allows -plane or -plane scan [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of the infinite array model becomes better as the array size becomes bigger and its validity has been established even for a small 7x7 array [2]. Based on Scharstein's work, [5] we believe that the use of the infinite array model for external mutual coupling employed in the GLISTIN antenna may introduce errors in slot voltages only in the outermost two rows and two columns with minimal error in the input reflection coefficient. Several computer programs were developed to solve the pertinent coupled integral equations for the slot aperture electric field by the method of moments.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Regarding patterns, however, solutions can be obtained by reciprocity from periodic‐excitation problems, by computing the voltage across the antenna loads of all antennas for plane wave incidence from directions covering the whole upper hemisphere. This approach has for instance been adopted by Craeye and Dardenne [2006] to compute the embedded element patterns in ultrawideband arrays, based on the solution of finite‐by‐infinite arrays [ Scharstein , 1990; Ellgardt and Norgren , 2010]. The latter can be viewed as the solutions from infinite arrays, from which one withdraws the currents induced by the complementary parts of the infinite array [ Denison and Scharstein , 1995], that occupy two semi‐infinite planar arrays (i.e., arrays with one edge only) and supporting the infinite‐array currents.…”
Section: Finite‐array Analysis: From Infinite To Finitementioning
confidence: 99%