1986
DOI: 10.1016/0378-1119(86)90268-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutations that reduce expression from the P2 promoter of the Escherichia coli galactose operon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
63
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
8
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…, in which the P2 promoter was inactivated by a single nucleotide change (10,11), almost 100% of the transcription was initiated from P1, as expected (Fig. 3A).…”
Section: Race Primer Extension Assaysupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…, in which the P2 promoter was inactivated by a single nucleotide change (10,11), almost 100% of the transcription was initiated from P1, as expected (Fig. 3A).…”
Section: Race Primer Extension Assaysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…3A). In another mutant strain, MG1655kanP1 -P2 + , in which the P1 promoter has been inactivated by a single nucleotide change (10,11), most of the gal transcription was initiated http://bmbreports.org from P2 (Fig. 3A).…”
Section: Race Primer Extension Assaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown schematically in Figure 1B, two chromosomal fusions were constructed in the reporter strain (DM0022). In one of these, the gal promoter was mutated to inactivate P2 transcription while retaining P1 transcription (Bingham et al 1986) and fused to the lacZ gene such that O I was deleted. This fusion, in which lacZ transcription from P1 is repressed by GalR binding to O E , was used to measure GalR-binding activity.…”
Section: Genetic Screen For Galr Mutants Defective In Dna Loopingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fusion, in which lacZ transcription from P1 is repressed by GalR binding to O E , was used to measure GalR-binding activity. To measure loop formation, the gal promoter in a second fusion was mutated so that transcription occurred only from P2 (Bingham et al 1986) and joined to the gusA reporter gene such that O I was retained. The efficacy of the promoter mutations in completely inactivating P1 or P2 while retaining transcription from the other promoter was verified by measuring RNA synthesis in vivo by primer extension.…”
Section: Genetic Screen For Galr Mutants Defective In Dna Loopingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent work, we and others have measured the effects of over 60 different point mutations in the gal operon promoter region [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Surprisingly, with one exception, none of the mutations cause drastic reductions in expression from the gal promoter region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%