1997
DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560060410
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutations of fumarase that distinguish between the active site and a nearby dicarboxylic acid binding site

Abstract: Two mutant forms of fumarase C from E. coli have been made using PCR and recombinant DNA. The recombinant form of the protein included a histidine arm on the C-terminal facilitating purification. Based on earlier studies, two different carboxylic acid binding sites, labeled A- and B-, were observed in crystal structures of the wild type and inhibited forms of the enzyme. A histidine at each of the sites was mutated to an asparagine. H188N at the A-site resulted in a large decrease in specific activity, while t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

4
56
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The location of the active site cleft in the ASL superfamily was first suggested from the wild type t␦c1 structure (15) and later confirmed by structural studies of fumarase C (20,21,44) and H162N d␦c2 (19). In the present structure, argininosuccinate was bound in all four active sites of S283A d␦c2.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The location of the active site cleft in the ASL superfamily was first suggested from the wild type t␦c1 structure (15) and later confirmed by structural studies of fumarase C (20,21,44) and H162N d␦c2 (19). In the present structure, argininosuccinate was bound in all four active sites of S283A d␦c2.…”
Section: Figsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Residues in these conserved regions have been implicated in catalysis. [10][11][12][13][14] ADL catalyzes the cleavage of ADS through a general acid-base mechanism involving the β-elimination of fumarate (Figure 1(a)). The reaction is initiated by abstraction of the C β -proton from the substrate by the general base, resulting in the formation of a carbanion intermediate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In prokaryotes on the other hand, there are two distinct classes of fumarase molecules: class I fumarases are heat-labile and Fe 2ϩ -dependent, dimeric enzymes with subunits of 60 kDa each, having no obvious sequence homology to the eukaryotic enzymes, whereas class II fumarases are heat-stable, Fe 2ϩ -independent tetrameric enzymes with subunits of 50 kDa and showing extensive homology to the eukaryotic fumarases. Recently the three-dimensional structure of Escherichia coli class II fumarase has been unraveled (5)(6)(7). According to crystallographic data, each subunit is composed of three domains, of which the central one (D2) forms a 5-helix bundle.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residues Thr-100, Ser-139, Ser-140, and Asn-141 from the b-subunit, Thr-187, His-188 from the d-subunit, and Lys-324, Asn-326 from the c-subunit were supposed to form direct hydrogen bonds with substrates and inhibitors (5,6). Moreover a highly coordinated buried water molecule was found at the A site and supposed to be associated to residues Ser-98, Thr-100, Asn-141 from the b-subunit and His-188 from the d-subunit (6,7). An additional binding site (site B) is supposed to be nearby and is built up of residues belonging to one single subunit (the bsubunit), i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation