2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03833.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutations in the C‐terminal domain of ALSV (Avian Leukemia and Sarcoma Viruses) integrase alter the concerted DNA integration process in vitro

Abstract: Integrase (IN) is the retroviral enzyme responsible for the integration of the DNA copy of the retroviral genome into the host cell DNA. The C-terminal domain of IN is involved in DNA binding and enzyme multimerization. We previously performed single amino acid substitutions in the C-terminal domain of the avian leukemia and sarcoma viruses (ALSV) IN [Moreau et al. (2002). Arch. Virol. 147, 1761-1778]. Here, we modelled these IN mutants and analysed their ability to mediate concerted DNA integration (in an in … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, we conclude that the primary role of the core-core interface is in assembly of a tetrameric synaptic complex, which can catalyze the concerted joining of two 3Ј viral DNA ends into a target DNA (33,34). This interpretation is supported by previously published effects of other substitutions in this core-core interface (55).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Consequently, we conclude that the primary role of the core-core interface is in assembly of a tetrameric synaptic complex, which can catalyze the concerted joining of two 3Ј viral DNA ends into a target DNA (33,34). This interpretation is supported by previously published effects of other substitutions in this core-core interface (55).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…As our recombinant HIV-1 IN was not able to catalyze concerted integration from a blunt ended DNA substrate, we used a two LTRs pre-cleaved substrate mimicking the 3′ processed viral DNA and carrying 18 bp from U3 and U5 along with a two bases overgang TA at each 5′end (Figure 1A). This shows that this enzyme was less efficient for performing the whole integration reaction than the purified preintegration complex (PIC) or INs from other retroviral sources (3,13). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volumetric determination of IN–DNA complexes as determined by atomic force microscopy revealed substrate-induced assembly of a tetramer (28). Moreover, avian IN mutants, in which tetramer formation is altered, are less efficient at performing two-ended concerted DNA integration (13). Tetramers and dimers have been reported in Mu transposase.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). The isolated products were ligated and subsequently used to transform MC1061/P3 cells (Invitrogen) (41,42). The donor-target junctions of individually isolated recombinants were sequenced using HIV-1 U3 and U5 sequence-specific primers (46).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%