1995
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.270.11.6412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutations in Domain I of Bacillus thuringiensis δ-Endotoxin CryIAb Reduce the Irreversible Binding of Toxin to Manduca sexta Brush Border Membrane Vesicles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
67
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of this study concluded that a positive charge in this position could participate in the formation of specific binding domain or that it could be important for the arrangement of α-helices in the amino terminal region of the toxin, and that the conformation of this domain could indirectly disrupt the specificity domain of the toxin [44]. The introduction of a negative charge in residue A92 supported this hypothesis since mutations A92E and A92D were severely affected in toxicity and correlated with loss of pore formation [8,44]. It was finally proposed that the irreversible insertion into the BBMV was affected in A92E and A92D mutants [8].…”
Section: Mutagenesis Of Helix α-3 Of Different Cry Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The authors of this study concluded that a positive charge in this position could participate in the formation of specific binding domain or that it could be important for the arrangement of α-helices in the amino terminal region of the toxin, and that the conformation of this domain could indirectly disrupt the specificity domain of the toxin [44]. The introduction of a negative charge in residue A92 supported this hypothesis since mutations A92E and A92D were severely affected in toxicity and correlated with loss of pore formation [8,44]. It was finally proposed that the irreversible insertion into the BBMV was affected in A92E and A92D mutants [8].…”
Section: Mutagenesis Of Helix α-3 Of Different Cry Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The introduction of a negative charge in residue A92 supported this hypothesis since mutations A92E and A92D were severely affected in toxicity and correlated with loss of pore formation [8,44]. It was finally proposed that the irreversible insertion into the BBMV was affected in A92E and A92D mutants [8]. Residue R93 is located in position a of the predicted coiled coil structure of helix α-3 (Fig 1), and as stated above this is a highly conserved amino acid within the Cry toxin family.…”
Section: Mutagenesis Of Helix α-3 Of Different Cry Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors concluded that a positive charge in this position could participate in the formation of specific binding domain or that the conformation of this domain could indirectly disrupt the specificity domain of the toxin (52). The mutations A92E and A92D were also severely affected in toxicity and correlated with loss of pore formation (52,53). It was proposed that the irreversible insertion of these mutants into the BBMV was affected (53).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these data could be explained if the isolated mutants in helix ␣-3 were unable to form stable oligomers that are important for making pore channels. In other reports the Arg-93 and Ala-92 of Cry1Ac toxin (located at the beginning of helix ␣-3) were changed to different amino acids, only the conservative change R93K was fully active, some other changes of Arg-93 (Gly, Ala, and Ser) showed 100-to 1000-fold reduced toxicity, whereas all other changes resulted in complete loss of toxicity (52,53). The authors concluded that a positive charge in this position could participate in the formation of specific binding domain or that the conformation of this domain could indirectly disrupt the specificity domain of the toxin (52).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%