1987
DOI: 10.1007/bf00051866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutations for polygenic traits in barley under nutrient stress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Deng and Lynch (1997) estimated V m /V E for mean clutch size to be 8.9 ϫ 10 Ϫ4 and 3.4 ϫ 10 Ϫ5 in Daphnia pulicaria and Daphnia arenata, respectively. Lynch (1988) analyzed data published by Cox et al (1987) to estimate V m /V E for grain yield in barley at Ͻ 1 ϫ 10 Ϫ4 in highnutrient conditions and 4 ϫ 10 Ϫ4 in low-nutrient conditions. Our estimates of V m ϭ 3.5 ϫ 10 Ϫ3 and V m /V E ϭ 4.6 ϫ 10 Ϫ3 per generation may be comparable with Houle's results (depending upon the magnitude of V E for fitness in Drosophila), but are about four times greater than the estimates reported for Daphnia pulex and clutch size in D. pulicaria and an order of magnitude greater than estimates for viability in Drosophila, mean clutch size in D. arenata, and grain yield in barley.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deng and Lynch (1997) estimated V m /V E for mean clutch size to be 8.9 ϫ 10 Ϫ4 and 3.4 ϫ 10 Ϫ5 in Daphnia pulicaria and Daphnia arenata, respectively. Lynch (1988) analyzed data published by Cox et al (1987) to estimate V m /V E for grain yield in barley at Ͻ 1 ϫ 10 Ϫ4 in highnutrient conditions and 4 ϫ 10 Ϫ4 in low-nutrient conditions. Our estimates of V m ϭ 3.5 ϫ 10 Ϫ3 and V m /V E ϭ 4.6 ϫ 10 Ϫ3 per generation may be comparable with Houle's results (depending upon the magnitude of V E for fitness in Drosophila), but are about four times greater than the estimates reported for Daphnia pulex and clutch size in D. pulicaria and an order of magnitude greater than estimates for viability in Drosophila, mean clutch size in D. arenata, and grain yield in barley.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two types of studies are therefore in rough accord. Cox et al (1987) recently completed an experiment with three inbred lines of barley grown at two nutrient levels following the design of Russell et al (1963) In their table 3, the authors record successive variance components for new sublines within lines. The expectation of each of these is 2V m .…”
Section: (Vii) Corn Vegetative and Reproductive Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expectation of each of these is 2V m . The sampling variance of mean phenotypes is reported in Table 2 (Cox et al 1987) as Error (b); multiplication of these by the sample size (30) generates estimates of V E . The resultant estimates of V m /V E for biomass (00001 and 00004) and grain (< 00001 and 00004) yield are quite low, the higher estimates arising under low nutrient conditions.…”
Section: (Vii) Corn Vegetative and Reproductive Traitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The environmental difference in this case was relatively small, however. Cox et al (1987) allowed mutations to accumulate for six generations in barley cultivars, and found no evidence for GEl for biomass and grain yield when the lines were tested in high and low nutrient environments. Variation among the lines in this experiment appears to have been relatively slight, however, as might be expected from only six generations of mutation accumulation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%