2014
DOI: 10.15171/ijb.1156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutational Pressure Drives Evolution of Synonymous Codon Usage in Genetically Distinct Oenothera plastomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Genes with low expression levels have high ENc values and more rare codons 32 . The expression of highly biased genes is considered as high 33 . The relative expression can be concluded from the ENc value, where small ENc value indicates higher bias and a generally higher level of expression 34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Genes with low expression levels have high ENc values and more rare codons 32 . The expression of highly biased genes is considered as high 33 . The relative expression can be concluded from the ENc value, where small ENc value indicates higher bias and a generally higher level of expression 34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 The expression of highly biased genes is considered as high. 33 The relative expression can be concluded from the ENc value, where small ENc value indicates higher bias and a generally higher level of expression. 34 Thus, the small ENc value is suggesting for higher gene expression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Fop, CAI and CBI indices use specific reference gene sets, they provide a measure of bias towards particular codons that appear to be translationally optimal in that species (Behura and Severson, 2013). Among these indices, use of CAI is most widely reported, for example in codon usage analysis of Oenothera (Nair et al, 2014) and G. biloba (He et al, 2016), while Fop has been applied in studies for Picea (De La Torre et al, 2015) and Medicago truncatula (Song et al, 2015). As CAI values are determined from reference sets of highly expressed genes, which may be different among species, the relative fitness values of the species will also be different.…”
Section: Tools and Indices For Assessing Codon Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Euclidean measurements of distance between the genes and the codon frequencies are estimated and the values plotted to visually indicate the association of genes to a particular codon and their similarities with other genes (Perrière and Thioulouse, 2002). Examples of cluster analysis applied to plant species include studies of the codon usage of protein coding sequences in G. biloba (He et al, 2016), herbaceous peony (Paeonia lactiflora) (Wu et al, 2015), citrus species (Xu et al, 2013), the chloroplast genome of Oenothera (Nair et al, 2014) and the mitochondrial genomes of wheat (Triticum aestivum), maize (Zea mays), Arabidopsis thaliana, tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum), Physcomitrella patens and Marchantia polymorpha (Zhou and Li, 2009). Cluster analyses have also been used to classify and categorize codon usage in various plant genomes (Ma et al, 2015;Priya et al, 2016), but in a few cases, the method did not accurately reflect the phylogenetic relationships among plants (Nair et al, 2014;You et al, 2015).…”
Section: Tools and Indices For Assessing Codon Usagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 Two data sets for a 2 × 2 matrix were developed by selecting 10% of the genes that were grouped on the left and the right extremes of the first axis of the correspondence analysis (COA). 33,34 Observed frequencies of codons in the two data sets are given in the first row and the total number of synonymous alternatives of that given codon is given in the second row of the 2 × 2 matrix. 30 Level of significance was measured at P , 0.05. codon adaptation index.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%