2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.01.12.426324
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutational impact and signature of ionizing radiation

Abstract: Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) of human tumors and normal cells exposed to various carcinogens has revealed distinct mutational patterns that provide deep insights into the DNA damage and repair processes. Although ionizing radiation (IR) is conventionally known as a strong carcinogen, its genome-wide mutational impacts have not been comprehensively investigated at the single-nucleotide level. Here, we explored the mutational landscape of normal single-cells after exposure to the various levels of IR. On averag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A loss of this gene (whose full name is “X-Ray Repair Cross Complementing 4”) is well-appreciated to increase sensitivity to ionizing radiation 4648 . Moreover, this indel signature is similar to the indel mutational signature provoked by ionizing hoton radiation, reported in a recent preprint, where clonal organoids from mouse and human cells were irradiated 49 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A loss of this gene (whose full name is “X-Ray Repair Cross Complementing 4”) is well-appreciated to increase sensitivity to ionizing radiation 4648 . Moreover, this indel signature is similar to the indel mutational signature provoked by ionizing hoton radiation, reported in a recent preprint, where clonal organoids from mouse and human cells were irradiated 49 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…ID83D was found only in the MCF7 cell line and in both irradiated conditions, suggesting a possible tissue-specific mutagenic effect (it was not seen in blood or lung cells); this leaves similar footprints to those reported elsewhere for photon-based ionizing radiation 49 .…”
Section: Mutational Signatures Of Indels Across Cell Types and Condit...supporting
confidence: 84%
“…ID83B was modeled as a mixture of 4 PCAWG signatures (Fig. 4 d), with higher weights of the ID12 (unknown aetiology) and ID8 (ionizing-radiation associated signature) 30 , 45 and ID4 (unknown aetiology). The spectrum of ID83B consists of various lengths (1–5 bp with similar frequency) insertions and deletions outside of DNA repeats, as well as a notable component of deletions with short flanking microhomology (mostly 1–2 nt; we note this contrasts with the microhomology-flanked deletions resulting from homologous recombination deficiencies, which tend to be ≥ 2 nt 46 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest proportion of mutants being SNVs is in line with the analysis of IR induced secondary tumours [ 17 ]. In contrast, increased SNVs could not be detected in thyroid carcinomas, linked to the Chernobyl disaster [ 19 ] and irradiated human organoids [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recent studies, analysing thyroid carcinomas, linked to Iodine-131 exposure related to the Chernobyl disaster failed to detect increased SNV levels, indels and SVs being increased [ 19 ]. Human organoid exposure to IR similarly only led to increased indels and SVs [ 20 ]. In radiation induced tumours induced in p53 mutant mice SNVs levels were reported to be rare, indels and SV being detectable [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%