2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutational and biophysical robustness in a prestabilized monobody

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kd values of CRT3-Rluc8 and CRT4-Rluc8 (7.990 ± 0.870 nM and 8.686 ± 0.836 nM) showed efficient CRT binding ( Figure 3 C). These values were comparable to the affinities of other monobody proteins and typical antibodies [ 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 ], further demonstrating that the engineered CRT3 and CRT4 monobodies had strong binding affinities for CRT.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Kd values of CRT3-Rluc8 and CRT4-Rluc8 (7.990 ± 0.870 nM and 8.686 ± 0.836 nM) showed efficient CRT binding ( Figure 3 C). These values were comparable to the affinities of other monobody proteins and typical antibodies [ 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 ], further demonstrating that the engineered CRT3 and CRT4 monobodies had strong binding affinities for CRT.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Since its introduction in the 1990s, the FN3 scaffold has been modified with the goal of enhancing its stability so that it can accept an ever greater number and diversity of sequence variants ( 43 , 44 , 45 ). Using one of the ultra-stable FN3 derivatives as a starting scaffold might permit isolation of a wider range of sequence variants than was observed in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some binding energy is inevitably siphoned off to drive the fold shift. The main reason, however is that transposing the ligand-contacting residues from different monobodies onto a common scaffold does not capture all the nuances of the binding interactions 38,53 . This method can reproduce parental binding affinities (e.g., FN3 SUMO (Table 2) and a VEGFR2-binding consensus-designed FN3 53 ), but these cases seem to be exceptions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reason, however is that transposing the ligand-contacting residues from different monobodies onto a common scaffold does not capture all the nuances of the binding interactions 38,53 . This method can reproduce parental binding affinities (e.g., FN3 SUMO (Table 2) and a VEGFR2-binding consensus-designed FN3 53 ), but these cases seem to be exceptions. Additional computational redesign, such as that employed in the lucCage study, may be expected to improve affinity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%