2016
DOI: 10.1002/humu.22963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

mutation3D: Cancer Gene Prediction Through Atomic Clustering of Coding Variants in the Structural Proteome

Abstract: A new algorithm and web server, mutation3D (http://mutation3d.org), proposes driver genes in cancer by identifying clusters of amino acid substitutions within tertiary protein structures. We demonstrate the feasibility of using a 3D clustering approach to implicate proteins in cancer based on explorations of single proteins using the mutation3D web interface. On a large scale, we show that clustering with mutation3D is able to separate functional from non-functional mutations by analyzing a combination of 8,86… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
95
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
95
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the methods differ in detail, e.g., in the tumor sets analyzed, the definition of 3D clusters, and the statistical test applied, and so they produce different lists of candidate functional mutations. For example, Mutation3D identified 399 mutated residues in 75 genes as likely functional [17], HotMAPS identified 398 mutated residues in 91 genes [18], and Hotspot3D identified 14,929 mutated residues in 2466 genes [19], whereas our method identified 3404 mutated residues in 503 genes (Additional file 6: Table S5 and Additional file 7: Figure S2). Somewhat surprisingly, only 15 mutated residues were identified by all four methods, all of which were also previously identified as single-residue hotspots [6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, the methods differ in detail, e.g., in the tumor sets analyzed, the definition of 3D clusters, and the statistical test applied, and so they produce different lists of candidate functional mutations. For example, Mutation3D identified 399 mutated residues in 75 genes as likely functional [17], HotMAPS identified 398 mutated residues in 91 genes [18], and Hotspot3D identified 14,929 mutated residues in 2466 genes [19], whereas our method identified 3404 mutated residues in 503 genes (Additional file 6: Table S5 and Additional file 7: Figure S2). Somewhat surprisingly, only 15 mutated residues were identified by all four methods, all of which were also previously identified as single-residue hotspots [6].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…StructMAn [15] annotated the amino acid variations of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the context of 3D structures. SpacePAC [16], Mutation3D [17], HotMAPS [18], and Hotspot3D [19] used 3D structures to identify mutational clusters in cancer. These efforts have generated interesting sets of candidate functional mutations and illustrate that many rare driver mutations are functionally, and potentially clinically, relevant.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…42 Mutation 3D 43 was used to model mutations onto known protein structures and identify significant clusters.…”
Section: Histone Gene Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This tool is intended to be utilized for the identification of groups of amino acid substitutions appearing from somatic cancer mutations across several patients in direction to determine fuel downstream suggestions and functional hotspots [25].…”
Section: Structural and Functional Impact Prediction Of Snpsmentioning
confidence: 99%