2017
DOI: 10.20546/ijcmas.2017.612.418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutation Studies in Fruit Crops: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, bud mutations are an important source of new varieties of fruit crops. Characteristics such as a perennial nature, long juvenile phase, heterozygosity, and sexual incompatibilities in fruit crops hamper their improvement through conventional breeding [18]. Compared with conventional hybridization, the selection of bud mutants gives the advantages of shortening the breeding cycle and reducing the workload and costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In general, bud mutations are an important source of new varieties of fruit crops. Characteristics such as a perennial nature, long juvenile phase, heterozygosity, and sexual incompatibilities in fruit crops hamper their improvement through conventional breeding [18]. Compared with conventional hybridization, the selection of bud mutants gives the advantages of shortening the breeding cycle and reducing the workload and costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of perennial fruit trees of economic importance originated from bud changes [20][21]. However, Spontaneous bud mutation occurs at a very low frequency, moreover, many of these mutations may be deleterious, making the organism less adapted to its environment, and in some cases may even be lethal [18]. Therefore, mutants that survive in adverse environments and even present excellent phenotypes are considered to have good characteristics for adaption.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is important to mention that synonyms could also harbor somatic mutations that have not altered phenotypes enough to define themselves as new cultivars. It has been known that synonyms and somatic mutants have rarely been distinguished from the original type with a limited number of markers (Nybom et al, 2014;Ruiz et al, 2019), as the chance for the mutation to be detected with a tested marker is low (Lee et al, 2016;Lamo et al, 2017). However, a deletion that caused the loss of heterozygosity on SEG16 distinguished "Dingaobian" (9) from its original type "Dingaomei" (C) in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Thus, a combined analysis offers increased sensitivity (Konstantinos et al, 2008). However, chemical mutagens are preferably used to induce point mutations, physical mutagens such as gamma raysinduce gross lesions, such as chromosomal abbreviation or rearrangements (Lamo et al, 2017). Therefore, the SSCP marker should be considered as a scanner method rather than identificationmethod (Fujita and Silver, 1994).Mutations in the Gf-2.8 gene were identified by the analysis of the SSCP in wheat (Wang et al, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%