2018
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/ery093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutation of SELF-PRUNING homologs in cotton promotes short-branching plant architecture

Abstract: We characterize GoSP genes underlying the development of cotton plants with short branches and clustered bolls, a phenotype that allows higher planting density and promotes increased fiber yield per acre.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
64
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
4
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…hirsutum [6365]. Our group has demonstrated that the FT homolog GhFT1 controls flowering time and TFL1 homolog SELFING-PRUNING ( GhSP ) regulates fruiting branches architecture in cotton [6668], and similar findings have also been reported in other groups [6971]. However, the exact biological functions of GhMFT homologs in Upland cotton remain unclear.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…hirsutum [6365]. Our group has demonstrated that the FT homolog GhFT1 controls flowering time and TFL1 homolog SELFING-PRUNING ( GhSP ) regulates fruiting branches architecture in cotton [6668], and similar findings have also been reported in other groups [6971]. However, the exact biological functions of GhMFT homologs in Upland cotton remain unclear.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 53%
“…Subsequently, several Mendelian genes related to growth, disease resistance, and fiber development have been successfully identified in cotton. For instance, GhACT_LI1 [43], GoPGF [44], GhLMI1-D1b [45], GoSP [46], and GhLMMD [47] for fiber development, glandless phenotype, leaf shape, branching, and necrotic leaf damage have been cloned using the corresponding mutants, respectively.…”
Section: Map-based Cloningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In cotton, FD could interact with FT and CEN (TFL1 homolog), and thus antagonize FT activity in the apex and may act as transcriptional repressors of flowering transition, leading to prolonged vegetative growth [ 30 , 31 ]. Though expression of FT did not significantly increase in the silencing plant, the activity of FT could further enhance interaction with FD and promoter flower.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%