Progress in Botany 1994
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-78568-9_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutation: Higher Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 119 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, several crops have substantial plant-to-plant variation for tolerance within varieties, primarily in cross-pollinated species such as alfalfa (Noble et al, 1984) and sugarbeet (Ulrich, 1961). Variation can also be generated artificially by mutagenic agents (Gottschalk, 1981) or the use of tissue culture (somoclonal variation, Larkin and Scowcroft, 1981). Further, closely related species or wild progenitors of our target species can be used.…”
Section: Identified Variation In Salt Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, several crops have substantial plant-to-plant variation for tolerance within varieties, primarily in cross-pollinated species such as alfalfa (Noble et al, 1984) and sugarbeet (Ulrich, 1961). Variation can also be generated artificially by mutagenic agents (Gottschalk, 1981) or the use of tissue culture (somoclonal variation, Larkin and Scowcroft, 1981). Further, closely related species or wild progenitors of our target species can be used.…”
Section: Identified Variation In Salt Tolerancementioning
confidence: 99%