1996
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.271.29.17576
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutation Detection in the and Alleles of the Sodium Channel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
91
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
5
91
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using PCR and capillary sequencing, we validated 11 de novo L1 insertions (Table 1; Supplemental Table 2). All 11 were T F subfamily elements, consistent with previous reports of disease-causing L1 insertions in mice wherein all insertions for which sufficient L1 sequence was present for subfamily distinction were identified as T F elements (Kingsmore et al 1994;Mulhardt et al 1994;Kohrman et al 1996;Takahara et al 1996;Perou et al 1997;Naas et al 1998;Yajima et al 1999;Cunliffe et al 2001). De novo L1 insertions bore hallmarks of L1 retrotransposition by target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT), including insertion at sequences resembling the L1 endonuclease cleavage motif (5 ′ -TTTT/AA-3 ′ ), the presence of 13-to 17-bp target-site duplications (TSDs), and 3 ′ poly(A) tracts (Table 1; Supplemental Figs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Using PCR and capillary sequencing, we validated 11 de novo L1 insertions (Table 1; Supplemental Table 2). All 11 were T F subfamily elements, consistent with previous reports of disease-causing L1 insertions in mice wherein all insertions for which sufficient L1 sequence was present for subfamily distinction were identified as T F elements (Kingsmore et al 1994;Mulhardt et al 1994;Kohrman et al 1996;Takahara et al 1996;Perou et al 1997;Naas et al 1998;Yajima et al 1999;Cunliffe et al 2001). De novo L1 insertions bore hallmarks of L1 retrotransposition by target-primed reverse transcription (TPRT), including insertion at sequences resembling the L1 endonuclease cleavage motif (5 ′ -TTTT/AA-3 ′ ), the presence of 13-to 17-bp target-site duplications (TSDs), and 3 ′ poly(A) tracts (Table 1; Supplemental Figs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Several mutant alleles of Scn8a have been characterized, showing various combinations of ataxia, dystonia, and muscle weakness [129][130][131]. Various deficits in Purkinje cell function have been found in Scn8a mutant mice, although no major loss of Purkinje cells, as reported in many other types of mutant mice, has been described except in older Scn8amedJo mice.…”
Section: Models Of Hereditary Ataxiasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correctly spliced Scn8a transcripts were specifically amplified with a forward primer in exon 1 (59-CCG ACA GTT TCA AGC CTT TCA CCC-39) and a reverse primer in exon 2 (59-AGG ACT TAG AAT GTA CAA GGC AGG-39). Only correctly spliced Scn8a transcripts are amplified with these primers as the exon 3 splicesite mutation in Scn8a medJ results in a majority of incorrectly spliced transcripts lacking exon 2 and exon 3 (Kohrman et al 1996). RT-PCR products were examined on agarose gels.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A direct role for SCNM1 in splicing the Scn8a medJ transcript was subsequently demonstrated in a cell culture assay (Howell et al 2007). The Scn8a medJ mutation is a 4-bp deletion in the splice donor site of exon 3, nucleotides 15 to 18, generating a weak site with a C nucleotide at the consensus 15G position (Kohrman et al 1996). In the presence of a wild-type Scnm1 gene, only 10% of the Scn8a medJ transcripts are correctly spliced and encode an active channel, while $90% of the transcripts skip exon 2 and exon 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%