2001
DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5200756
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutation detection for exons 2 to 10 of the Polycystic Kidney Disease 1 (PKD1)-gene by DGGE

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The extensive allelic heterogeneity in PKD1 and PKD2 , combined with the fact that no single mutation accounts for >2% of ADPKD‐affected families, necessitates mutation‐screening methods for accurate molecular diagnosis of ADPKD [Harris and Rossetti, 2010]. Although several indirect methods have been developed, such as denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis [Perrichot et al, 1999, 2000; Peters et al, 2001], single‐strand conformation polymorphism analysis [Veldhuisen et al, 1997], the protein‐truncation test [Roelfsema et al, 1997; Rossetti et al, 2001], DHPLC [Rossetti et al, 2002], Transgenomics SURVEYOR Nuclease and WAVE Nucleic Acid High Sensitivity Fragment Analysis [Tan et al, 2009], and high resolution melt analysis [Bataille et al, 2011], direct sequencing [Garcia‐Gonzalez et al, 2007; Rossetti et al, 2007] is undoubtedly the gold standard.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extensive allelic heterogeneity in PKD1 and PKD2 , combined with the fact that no single mutation accounts for >2% of ADPKD‐affected families, necessitates mutation‐screening methods for accurate molecular diagnosis of ADPKD [Harris and Rossetti, 2010]. Although several indirect methods have been developed, such as denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis [Perrichot et al, 1999, 2000; Peters et al, 2001], single‐strand conformation polymorphism analysis [Veldhuisen et al, 1997], the protein‐truncation test [Roelfsema et al, 1997; Rossetti et al, 2001], DHPLC [Rossetti et al, 2002], Transgenomics SURVEYOR Nuclease and WAVE Nucleic Acid High Sensitivity Fragment Analysis [Tan et al, 2009], and high resolution melt analysis [Bataille et al, 2011], direct sequencing [Garcia‐Gonzalez et al, 2007; Rossetti et al, 2007] is undoubtedly the gold standard.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filters were also hybridized with probe D16S138 (N2; Himmelbauer et al, 1991) to check equal loading. Radiation hybrid HJ145.19, which contains only the PKD1 gene and the rodent-human somatic cell hybrid N23HA, which contains only the homologous region, were used to validate the probes (The European Polycystic Kidney Disease Consortium, 1994; Peters et al, 2001). Probe intron 1 recognized the 20kb EcoRI+AflII fragment and a 30kb fragment from the homologous region.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The limitation of detection rate may be due to low sensitivity of SSCP for mutation screening in long cDNA fragments (>300 bp) usually present after the digestion of PCR products with restriction enzymes and also probably due to the use of only single SSCP condition. However, this detection rate is comparable to that of protein-truncation test (PTT) which is about 52% [26,27] although it is lower than that of DGGE [28-30] and DHPLC [15] which are about 60% and 70%, respectively. In the MRF-SSCP analysis, false-positive mobility shifts of the digested-cDNA fragments were found to be about 10%, which could be mainly eliminated by repeating the screening experiment or performing the analysis in more than one affected members in the same family.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%