Proceedings. Ninth IEEE International High-Level Design Validation and Test Workshop (IEEE Cat. No.04EX940) 2004
DOI: 10.1109/hldvt.2004.1431242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutation-based validation of high-level microprocessor implementations

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Camos et al [69] introduce a general description of abstract mutation based design error models that can be tailored to span any coverage measure for microprocessor validation. They then present a method of effectively using this statistical information to guide the ATPG efforts.…”
Section: Thaker Et Al Use Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Camos et al [69] introduce a general description of abstract mutation based design error models that can be tailored to span any coverage measure for microprocessor validation. They then present a method of effectively using this statistical information to guide the ATPG efforts.…”
Section: Thaker Et Al Use Inmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique reduces the search space per mutant generator by selecting the signal that acts as the most common activation criteria in that cluster and designating this signal as the partitioning point. A detailed description of our "clustering and partitioning" technique can be found in [2].…”
Section: Integrating Mutant Value Generation Into the Simulation Ementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous research [1], we have defined a method to generate highly effective input stimuli by targeting the set of constraints that potentially exposes the largest number of modeled errors for any given ATPG iteration; this method, however, requires deterministic ATPG. Common high-level ATPG methods do not always perform deterministic ATPG [2] [3], and the ones that do rely on first synthesizing portions of the high-level microprocessor implementation [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our previous research [1][5] [6], we have developed the methods that implement MVP (Mutationbased Validation Paradigm), our validation environment for high-level microprocessor implementations. MVP is able to handle complete implementations because it only uses high-level information, and only uses the hardware description language (HDL) information relevant to the set of constraints when identifying all relevant architectural states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%