1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0027-5107(98)00057-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutation analyses of KRAS exon 1 comparing three different techniques: temporal temperature gradient electrophoresis, constant denaturant capillaryelectrophoresis and allele specific polymerase chain reaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
57
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Using heteroduplex (hybridized from wild type and mutant homoduplexes) analysis for the detection of single base substitutions leads to a signi®cant increase in detection ef®-ciency (Abrams and Stanton 1992). To date, heteroduplexes have been used for human genetic screening applications using TTGE (Bùrresen-Dale et al 1997;Bjùrheim et al 1998;Marsh et al 1998). To our knowledge, heteroduplex analysis, except for the coanalysis of undesired heteroduplex formation during PCR, has not yet been reported for studies on microbial communities (Muyzer and Smalla 1998).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using heteroduplex (hybridized from wild type and mutant homoduplexes) analysis for the detection of single base substitutions leads to a signi®cant increase in detection ef®-ciency (Abrams and Stanton 1992). To date, heteroduplexes have been used for human genetic screening applications using TTGE (Bùrresen-Dale et al 1997;Bjùrheim et al 1998;Marsh et al 1998). To our knowledge, heteroduplex analysis, except for the coanalysis of undesired heteroduplex formation during PCR, has not yet been reported for studies on microbial communities (Muyzer and Smalla 1998).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To calculate the ESEGR for TTGE, the temporal temperature increase (ramping rate) was converted into a hypothetical chemical denaturant increase by using a conversion factor of 0Á3 C temperature increase per 1% chemical denaturant (Abrams and Stanton 1992) and related to the uidA amplicon migration rate in the gel; the amplicon migration rate was determined in a TTGE gel below denaturation conditions for the uidA fragment. The TTGE analysis, performed according to Bùrresen-Dale et al (1997), showed an ESEGR of 2Á3% cm À1 chemical denaturant increase.…”
Section: Estimated Spatial Equivalent Gradient Resolution Of Temporalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If limit of detection were the main focus then a single capillary system would be the instruments choose. CDCE has a limit of detection down to 10 −3 on a regular basis 9,13,15,36 , but has been used to study mutant fractions down to 10 −6 35, 79 . Furthermore, peak collection and enrichment can be performed on the single capillary system 34-37, 63, 70 .…”
Section: Anticipated Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improved methods have included modes of sequencing DNA [5][6][7] , allele-specific recognition of mutant sequences [8][9][10] and methods that separate point mutant from wild type sequences on the basis of lower thermal stability in wild type/mutant heteroduplexes as opposed to wild type homoduplexes [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] . A review of all of these contributions is beyond the scope of this effort; here we focus on the technical history and applications of methods that depend on the separation of wild type and mutant sequences on the basis of kinetics of DNA melting and reannealing while DNA is moved by electromotive force through a molecular sieve such as a polyacrylamide gel.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pellet was incubated with 10 pellet volumes (approximately 500 µl) of lysis buffer (0.32 M sucrose, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1% (v/v) Triton X-100) and 0.2 volumes of proteinase K (final concentration 400 µg ml -1 ) for 2 to 3 days at 37˚C. DNA was phenol-chloroform extracted and precipitated in ethanol using conventional techniques (Bjorheim et al, 1998). The resulting DNA pellet was resuspended in 50 µl TE buffer, pH 7.4, (10 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0).…”
Section: K-ras-2 Mutation Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%