2011
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1101734108
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutated β-catenin evades a microRNA-dependent regulatory loop

Abstract: hsa-mir-483 is located within intron 2 of the IGF2 gene. We have previously shown oncogenic features of miR-483-3p through cooperation with IGF2 or by independently targeting the proapoptotic gene BBC3/PUMA. Here we demonstrate that expression of miR-483 can be induced independently of IGF2 by the oncoprotein β-catenin through an interaction with the basic helix-loop-helix protein upstream stimulatory transcription factor 1. We also show that β-catenin itself is a target of miR-483-3p, triggering a negative re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
55
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, our results further strengthen the idea that the regulation of beta‐catenin by miRNAs is linked to p53 signaling 17. We noticed that the exon 3 deletion in HepG2 cells made mutated beta‐catenin more resistant to miRNAs, confirming previous data with miR‐483‐3p in colon cancer cells 18. Such resistance was not measurable in Huh6 cells, which carry a single point mutation in one of the beta‐catenin alleles 8.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, our results further strengthen the idea that the regulation of beta‐catenin by miRNAs is linked to p53 signaling 17. We noticed that the exon 3 deletion in HepG2 cells made mutated beta‐catenin more resistant to miRNAs, confirming previous data with miR‐483‐3p in colon cancer cells 18. Such resistance was not measurable in Huh6 cells, which carry a single point mutation in one of the beta‐catenin alleles 8.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…All miRNAs efficiently down‐regulated wild‐type beta‐catenin, but the deleted form was less responsive to miRNAs, especially with miR‐885‐5p and miR‐449b‐3p. Such small RNA‐silencing resistance of deleted beta‐catenin was described for miR‐483‐3p18 and an siRNA against beta‐catenin3 without providing any explanation for this phenomenon. We speculate that a much longer protein half‐life could be a reason for a lower inhibitory effect because exon 3 deletion allows beta‐catenin to escape from proteosomal degradation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations