2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41698-021-00144-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutated clones driving leukemic transformation are already detectable at the single-cell level in CD34-positive cells in the chronic phase of primary myelofibrosis

Abstract: Disease progression of myeloproliferative neoplasms is the result of increased genomic complexity. Since the ability to predict disease evolution is crucial for clinical decisions, we studied single-cell genomics and transcriptomics of CD34-positive cells from a primary myelofibrosis (PMF) patient who progressed to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) while receiving Ruxolitinib. Single-cell genomics allowed the reconstruction of clonal hierarchy and demonstrated that TET2 was the first mutated gene while FLT3 was the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Targeted panels can be designed to detect SNVs and small indels, also determining their zygosity in each cell. VAF inferred from single cell data is consistent with the one originated from bulk NGS [ 73 , 75 ]. Unlike prior methods, single cell genomic analysis is able to detect SNVs down to 0.1% VAF.…”
Section: Single Cell Technologiessupporting
confidence: 77%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Targeted panels can be designed to detect SNVs and small indels, also determining their zygosity in each cell. VAF inferred from single cell data is consistent with the one originated from bulk NGS [ 73 , 75 ]. Unlike prior methods, single cell genomic analysis is able to detect SNVs down to 0.1% VAF.…”
Section: Single Cell Technologiessupporting
confidence: 77%
“…These observations were confirmed and expanded in recent years, taking advantage of the most recent single cell approaches [ 72 ]. Compared with single cell genomics, genotyping of colonies does not necessary reflect the real subclones’ frequency, because some of them might display a growth advantage in vitro that leads to biased mutation detection compared to variant allele frequency (VAF) derived from bulk analysis [ 62 , 63 , 73 ].…”
Section: Clonal Phylogenesis In Mpnsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Parenti et al. recently reported a primary myelofibrosis patient in whom ruxolitinib seemed to increase PD-L1 expression on preexisting leukemic CD34-positive cells, along with reduced T-cell activation during disease progression to AML [12] . However, the mechanism by which ruxolitinib contributes to the process of CNL-associated transformation of AML remains to be elucidated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, “High Molecular Risk (HMR)” mutations (e.g., in ASXL1 , IDH1/2 , SRSF2 and EZH2 genes) have been associated to a worse prognosis and a more frequent leukemic transformation [ 4 ]. The serial acquisition of somatic mutations underlies the clonal evolution in MPNs and we have recently reconstructed by single cell analysis the sequence of mutational events associated to PMF progression [ 5 ]. MF is the most severe among the MPNs and is characterized by the occurrence of bone marrow fibrosis and a consequent abnormal increase in the number of circulating CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%