1985
DOI: 10.1016/0014-5793(85)80739-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutant species of EF‐Tu, altered at position 375, exhibit a reduced affinity for aminoacylated transfer‐RNAs

Abstract: The interaction between EF-Tu GTP and aminoacyl-tRNA is shown to be influenced by mutations at site 375 of this three-domain protein. Site 375 is located in domain II near the interface with domain I [(1984) EMBO J. 3. 113-1201. Replacement of the alanine at this site by a threonine or valine residue results in lower binding constants with Phe-tRNA and Tyr-tRNA. as was evaluated by the hydrolysis protection technique. The data are discussed in the light of what is known about the three-dimensional structure of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1986
1986
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can only be said that the functional changes observed in the three mutated factors isolated until now are probably all the results of long-range effects. This interpretation is supported by the finding that the two kirromycin-resistant EF-Tu mutants EF-TuAla375-*vai and EF-TuAla.375-Thr reveal specific changes in the interaction with GTP and aa-tRNA as well as in their basic GTPase activity independent of aa-tRNA, ribosomes, and kirromycin (intrinsic GTPase activity; Ivell et al, 1981;Swart et al, 1982;Sam et al, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…It can only be said that the functional changes observed in the three mutated factors isolated until now are probably all the results of long-range effects. This interpretation is supported by the finding that the two kirromycin-resistant EF-Tu mutants EF-TuAla375-*vai and EF-TuAla.375-Thr reveal specific changes in the interaction with GTP and aa-tRNA as well as in their basic GTPase activity independent of aa-tRNA, ribosomes, and kirromycin (intrinsic GTPase activity; Ivell et al, 1981;Swart et al, 1982;Sam et al, 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The location of A375T in the cleft between domains I and III of EF-Tu suggests that it could do so by influencing the relative movement of these domains that occurs upon GTP hydrolysis (Berchtold et al 1993). Interestingly, A375T or other substitutions in the cleft lower the binding affinity of EF-Tu for aminoacyl-tRNA (Sam et al 1985;Vorstenbosch et al 2000), perhaps reflecting an enhanced ability to release aminoacyl-tRNA into the A site after GTP hydrolysis.…”
Section: Suppression Of Streptomycin-resistance Phenotypes Of R37c Anmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kirromycin-resistant factors have a higher intrinsic GTPase activity (Fasano & Parmeggiani, 1981;Swart et al, 1982), and GTP hydrolysis is more readily stimulated by ribosomes (Figure 3C). Since Phe-tRNAPhe is not added in saturating amounts and the kirromycin-resistant EF-TuAla.375_Thr has lower affinity for aa-tRNA than the wild-type factor (Sam et al, 1985), slightly less GTP is hydrolyzed when the ternary complex is added (Figure 5C). As expected, the GTPase activity of EF-TuGiy.222-Asp is hardly stimulated by ribosomes (Figure 3B; Swart et al, 1987); nevertheless, its ternary complex can somewhat distinguish the different ribosomal complexes (Figure 5B).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%