The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1992
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(92)90257-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutant prohead RNAs in the in Vitro packaging of bacteriophage φ29 DNA-gp3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previously, the highly conserved residues U 54 and A 56 were changed to A and C, respectively. Modest decreases were observed in prohead binding competitor activity and a 4-fold and 2-fold drop, respectively, in capacity to reconstitute proheads and support phage assembly in prohead-defective extracts (15). The SELEX I results suggested that the least important residues of the E loop in prohead binding were G 57 and U 58 , in which change was quite frequent (Table I).…”
Section: Fig 4 Competition Filter Binding With Rna Pools Of Selex IImentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previously, the highly conserved residues U 54 and A 56 were changed to A and C, respectively. Modest decreases were observed in prohead binding competitor activity and a 4-fold and 2-fold drop, respectively, in capacity to reconstitute proheads and support phage assembly in prohead-defective extracts (15). The SELEX I results suggested that the least important residues of the E loop in prohead binding were G 57 and U 58 , in which change was quite frequent (Table I).…”
Section: Fig 4 Competition Filter Binding With Rna Pools Of Selex IImentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The competition activities, which normalize the [ 32 P]pRNA fraction bound with wild-type pRNA competitor (100%) and no competitor (0%) (8, 9), were as follows: 5S rRNA, 2%; pRNA, 100%; cycle 0, 4%; cycle 1, 12%; cycle 2, 16%; cycle 3, 46%; cycle 4, 83%; cycle 5, 97%; and cycle 6, 91%. changes in the pRNA sequence can produce drastic alterations in the predicted foldings (15). Studies on pRNA mutants with limited numbers of G to A or C to U changes generated by bisulfite mutagenesis showed that the foldings of pRNA have prognostic value.…”
Section: Fig 4 Competition Filter Binding With Rna Pools Of Selex IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For Northern blot, 20 mg of denatured RNA was resolved in a 0.6 M formaldehyde-1% agarose gel and transferred onto Hybond N+ nylon membrane (Amersham). Probes were prepared by random priming with the 1.8 kb XbaI fragment of HBV (adr) from plasmid p3.6 II and [a- 32 P] dATP according to the supplier (Promega). After hybridization with HBV probe, the blot was stripped and rehybridized with a probe of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) that served as an internal control for normalizing the level of total cell RNA.…”
Section: Analysis Of Hbv Viral Rna Transcriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 This RNA is termed packaging RNA or 'pRNA'. Computer models of the three-dimensional (3D) structure of a pRNA monomer, dimer and hexamer has been constructed 22 based on experimental data derived from photoaffinity crosslinking, 23,24 chemical modification and chemical modification interference, [25][26][27] complementary modification, [28][29][30][31][32] nuclease probing, 24,33 oligo targeting, 34 competition assays, 35,36 and cryo-atomic force microscopy. 25,27,37 pRNA hexamer docking with the connector crystal structure reveals a very impressive match with available biochemical, genetic, and physical data concerning the 3D structure of pRNA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cloning and production of RNA in bacteria with high yield has been reported (Wichitwechkarn et al, 1992;Ponchon and Dardel, 2007;Ponchon et al, 2009;Delebecque et al, 2011;Ponchon and Dardel, 2011). Bacteria fermentation is the direction for industry production, but currently, the bacteria high yield production of RNA nanoparticles with therapeutic functionality has not been reported.…”
Section: Low Yield and High Production Costsmentioning
confidence: 99%