1998
DOI: 10.1266/ggs.73.143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutagenic synergism detected between 1,2-dibromoethane and X rays in the stamen hairs of Tradescantia clone BNL 4430.

Abstract: Mutagenic interaction between 1,2-dibromoethane (EDB) and X rays was studied in the stamen hairs of Tradescantia clone BNL 4430, a blue/pink heterozygote. The young inflorescence-bearing shoots with roots of this clone cultivated in a nutrient solution circulating growth chamber were used as the tester plants. EDB is a promutagen and also a bifunctional alkylating agent with a high Swain-Scott substrate constant, but is thought to react probably via SN 1 mechanism. After confirming the dose-dependent mutagenic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been considered that mutagenic synergisms occur between different mutagens which have some interrelated or at least partly common mechanisms of action, and that no synergism would appear between different agents which cause entirely different damages on DNA (Shima and Ichikawa, 1994). It has also been thought most likely that DNA single-strand breaks produced commonly by X rays and several alkylating agents or promutagens are the major cause of the mutagenic synergisms observed earlier (Ichikawa et al, 1993;Ichikawa, 1995, 1997;Xiao and Ichikawa, 1995, 1998a, 1998b.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It has been considered that mutagenic synergisms occur between different mutagens which have some interrelated or at least partly common mechanisms of action, and that no synergism would appear between different agents which cause entirely different damages on DNA (Shima and Ichikawa, 1994). It has also been thought most likely that DNA single-strand breaks produced commonly by X rays and several alkylating agents or promutagens are the major cause of the mutagenic synergisms observed earlier (Ichikawa et al, 1993;Ichikawa, 1995, 1997;Xiao and Ichikawa, 1995, 1998a, 1998b.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the 3-week daily scorings of the numbers of hairs and pink mutants events (PMEs) as well as the average number of cells per hair, daily somatic mutation frequencies as the numbers of PMEs per 10 4 hair-cell divisions were calculated for each treatment. The data were pooled for the 4-day peak period of mutation frequency for each treatment as in earlier studies (Ichikawa et al, 1993;Shima and Ichikawa, 1994Xiao and Ichikawa, 1995, 1998a, 1998b.…”
Section: Combined Treatments With Ems and Mhmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The system has also been shown to be suitable for studying the variation in spontaneous somatic mutation frequency (Takahashi and Ichikawa, 1976;Schairer and Sautkulis, 1982;Schairer et al, 1983;Ichikawa 1984Ichikawa , 1992Ichikawa , 1994Imai et al, 1991;Sanda-Kamigawara et al, 1991Ichikawa et al, 1995Ichikawa et al, , 1996aIchikawa et al, , 1996bIchikawa and Wushur, 2000). The use of the young inflorescencebearing shoots with roots of clone BNL 4430 cultivated in a recently developed nutrient solution circulating (NSC) growth chamber (Shima and Ichikawa, 1994;Ichikawa and Wushur, 2000) has been shown to be especially efficient for detecting mutagenic synergisms (Shima and Ichikawa, 1994Xiao and Ichikawa, 1995, 1996, 1998a, 1998b or antagonisms (Xiao and Ichikawa, 1995, 1996, 1998a, 1998c among various chemicals and X-rays, making it possible to determine spontaneous background mutation frequencies with higher accuracy than before Ichikawa and Wushur, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%