2002
DOI: 10.1128/aem.68.1.194-200.2002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutagenic Analysis of a Conserved Region of Domain III in the Cry1Ac Toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis

Abstract: We used site-directed mutagenesis to probe the function of four alternating arginines located at amino acid positions 525, 527, 529, and 531 in a highly conserved region of domain III in the Cry1Ac toxin of Bacillus thuringiensis. We created 10 mutants: eight single mutants, with each arginine replaced by either glycine (G) or aspartic acid (D), and two double mutants (R525G/R527G and R529G/R531G). In lawn assays of the 10 mutants with a cultured Choristoneura fumiferana insect cell line (Cf1), replacement of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although an overall topology of this domain is rather similar to some carbohydrate-binding protein domains such as the cellulosebinding domain of a 1,4--glucanase enzyme (Johnson Biochemistry 1999) [28], its functional role is still not clearly elucidated. Nevertheless, it has been implicated in membrane permeabilisation (Masson AEM 2002) [29] or receptor recognition and specificity determination (Burton JMB 1999) [30] (De Maagd AEM 2000) [31] (Chayaratanasin JBMB 2007) [32]. This domain could be also critical for the structural integrity of the toxin molecule as the position of the C-terminus (i.e.…”
Section: Structural Description Of the Three-domain Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although an overall topology of this domain is rather similar to some carbohydrate-binding protein domains such as the cellulosebinding domain of a 1,4--glucanase enzyme (Johnson Biochemistry 1999) [28], its functional role is still not clearly elucidated. Nevertheless, it has been implicated in membrane permeabilisation (Masson AEM 2002) [29] or receptor recognition and specificity determination (Burton JMB 1999) [30] (De Maagd AEM 2000) [31] (Chayaratanasin JBMB 2007) [32]. This domain could be also critical for the structural integrity of the toxin molecule as the position of the C-terminus (i.e.…”
Section: Structural Description Of the Three-domain Toxinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Domain III is a β-sandwich that is comprised of two anti-parallel β-sheets. The role of this C-terminal domain is still unclear although it has been implicated in the structural integrity of toxin molecules (Li et al, 1991), membrane permeabilisation (Schwartz et al, 1997;Masson et al, 2002), or receptor binding that can influence insect specificity (Lee et al, 1995;de Maagd et al, 1996;Burton et al, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The toxins subsequently undergo a conformational change and insert into the membrane, forming a pore to create a functional ion channel. The toxin-exposed midgut epithelial cells eventually die by a colloid-osmotic lysis mechanism [2][3][4] .X-ray crystallography structures of 6 different Bt Cry δ-endotoxins were reported as Cry1Aa [5] , Cry2Aa [6] , Cry3Aa [7] , Cry3Bb [8] , Cry4Ba [9] and Cry4Aa [10] , which revealed a high degree of overall structural similarity, comprising 3 distinct domains. The N-terminal Domain I is directly involved in penetration of target membrane and ion channel formation [1,11] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The toxins subsequently undergo a conformational change and insert into the membrane, forming a pore to create a functional ion channel. The toxin-exposed midgut epithelial cells eventually die by a colloid-osmotic lysis mechanism [2][3][4] .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%