1992
DOI: 10.1099/0022-1317-73-9-2235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutagenesis of the L protein encoded by Bunyamwera virus and production of monospecific antibodies

Abstract: Bacterial fusion proteins containing portions of the Bunyamwera virus L protein were used as immunogens to prepare antisera in rabbits. Of five fusion proteins injected into rabbits, three yielded sera that reacted with the Bunyamwera virus L protein, detected by Western blotting or immunoprecipitation. Two of these antisera were specific for either the amino-or carboxy-terminal regions of the L protein. The specificity of these antisera was confirmed by their pattern of reactivity with full-length and truncat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(18 reference statements)
4
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alteration of the GDN sequence to GDD (the core polymerase motif of most positive-strand RNA viruses) or SDD (the core polymerase motif of segmented negative-strand RNA viruses) also resulted in complete abrogation of polymerase activity. These findings are similar to those observed for Bunyamweravirus (Jin & Elliott, 1992) and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV; Sleat & Bannerjee, 1993) L proteins. However, mutation of the VSV GDN sequence to GDD did not abrogate polymerase activity, but reduced it to 27% of the wild-type polymerase activity.…”
Section: Dsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Alteration of the GDN sequence to GDD (the core polymerase motif of most positive-strand RNA viruses) or SDD (the core polymerase motif of segmented negative-strand RNA viruses) also resulted in complete abrogation of polymerase activity. These findings are similar to those observed for Bunyamweravirus (Jin & Elliott, 1992) and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV; Sleat & Bannerjee, 1993) L proteins. However, mutation of the VSV GDN sequence to GDD did not abrogate polymerase activity, but reduced it to 27% of the wild-type polymerase activity.…”
Section: Dsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Domain II has a highly charged putative RNA-binding motif, and domain III contains a potential GDNQ phosphodiester bond-forming motif (33,43,45). Consistent with the predicted roles of domains II and III in viral RNA synthesis, most (domain II) or all (domain III) mutations within these motifs abolished RNA synthesis in several viruses (32,53,60,62,63). Although domains I, IV, and V are conserved among NNS viruses, no sequence elements were found which would indicate specific functions of these domains.…”
mentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Therefore, the effects of the L protein mutations on viral mRNA cap methylation were studied using detergent-activated purified viruses naturally carrying active virion-bound polymerase (3). wt, the original hr1, and the recombinant viruses were grown under permissive conditions (BHK cells, 34°C), purified, and first tested for their ability to synthesize mRNA in vitro, using a reaction mixture with or without AdoMet and containing [␣- 32 a The numbers represent the average of two to three experiments where the variation was less than 15% (as in Fig. 1 and 2), measuring the percentage of in vitro transcription (% Tnx) of each L compared to wt L (as 100%).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is presently unknown whether these four amino acid positions are critical for polymerase activity, since, to our knowledge, the L sequence published previously was not tested for function. Furthermore, none of the changes were situated within the conserved RNA-dependent RNA polymerase motifs identified previously (Jin & Elliott, 1992;Poch et al, 1989). The new LACV L sequence has been submitted to GenBank (accession no.…”
Section: Sequence Of the L Reading Framementioning
confidence: 99%