2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-28765-7_87
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutagenesis as a Diversity Enhancer and Preserver in Evolution Strategies

Abstract: Mutagenesis is a process which forces the coverage of certain zones of the search space during the generations of an evolution strategy, by keeping track of the covered ranges for the different variables in the so called gene matrix. Originally introduced as an artifact to control the automated stopping criterion in a memetic algorithm, ESLAT, it also improved the exploration capabilities of the algorithm, even though this was considered a secondary matter and not properly analyzed or tested. This work focuses… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be seen according to two different reasonings: theoretically, when the exploitation is more efficient, the algorithm will favor canonical cycles. Empirically, the results obtained are more consistent than the ones available in (Guerrero, Gómez-Jordana, Berlanga, & Molina, 2012), even though the populations sizes are greater (reducing the need for enhanced exploration) and the stopping criterion has been removed.…”
Section: Results Presentation and Analysissupporting
confidence: 52%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This can be seen according to two different reasonings: theoretically, when the exploitation is more efficient, the algorithm will favor canonical cycles. Empirically, the results obtained are more consistent than the ones available in (Guerrero, Gómez-Jordana, Berlanga, & Molina, 2012), even though the populations sizes are greater (reducing the need for enhanced exploration) and the stopping criterion has been removed.…”
Section: Results Presentation and Analysissupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Table 1, which represents the worst case for the strategy, since it shows the easiest problems, presents five results where mutagenesis is better according to mean value, but only one is considered statistically significant (even tough in some cases the median is equal or even lower), while four out of the five cases where canonical technique is better are considered statistically significant. This can lead to a discussion of the representativeness of non-parametric tests such as the one presented in Guerrero, Gómez-Jordana, Berlanga, and Molina (2012).…”
Section: Results Presentation and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation