1992
DOI: 10.1093/nar/20.22.5937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutagenesis analysis of the self-cleavage domain of hepatitis delta virus antigenomic RNA

Abstract: To determine the sequence requirements and structural features of the self-cleavage domain of hepatitis delta virus (HDV) antigenomic RNA, we constructed a series of mutants and measured the rate constant of the cleavage reaction for each. The self-cleavage activity of HDV RNA of antigenomic sense was found to reside in a region of less than 90 nucleotides in length. The catalytic domain contained a long complementary sequence which could be deleted to half of its original size. Moreover, this region could be … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
52
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
3
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…U pair in the HDV ribozymes is at the base of PI and is probably significant because of its proximity to the cleavage site. Replacing either or both of the bases that form the G.U pair results in decreased activity in both the genomic (Wu et al, 1993) and antigenomic sequences (Perrotta and Been, 1996;Wu and Huang, 1992). G.U and A .…”
Section: P1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…U pair in the HDV ribozymes is at the base of PI and is probably significant because of its proximity to the cleavage site. Replacing either or both of the bases that form the G.U pair results in decreased activity in both the genomic (Wu et al, 1993) and antigenomic sequences (Perrotta and Been, 1996;Wu and Huang, 1992). G.U and A .…”
Section: P1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Although, several investigations have been performed to address the questions related to the substrate specificity of ␦ ribozymes in both the cis-and transacting forms (2,(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12), most, if not all, experiments were carried out by randomly changing the base pairing combinations or by introducing mismatches which interfere with the WatsonCrick base pairing between the substrate and the ribozyme in the P1 stem (Fig. 1).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One or two nucleotide mismatches at any position of the P1 stem, except positions 5 and 11 (numbering according to Fig. 1), completely destroyed the activity (2,(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Although these are composite results from various versions of ␦ ribozymes, these findings could be interpreted as indicating that the positions located at both extremities of the base paired stem formed by the substrate and the ribozyme were more likely to tolerate a mismatch, resulting in distortion of the P1 stem, than the internal positions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both comparative sequence analysis and a variety of biochemical studies indicate that the genomic and antigenomic ribozymes have closely related, but not identical, structures. Several models for each ribozyme have been proposed, tested, refined (14,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35) and reviewed (13). Despite the progress that has been made, more work is needed to establish the details ofthe active structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%