2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.02.09.430480
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Mutability of mononucleotide repeats, not oxidative stress, explains the discrepancy between laboratory-accumulated mutations and the natural allele-frequency spectrum inC. elegans

Abstract: Important clues about natural selection can be gleaned from discrepancies between the properties of segregating genetic variants and of mutations accumulated experimentally under minimal selection, provided the mutational process is the same in the lab as in nature. The ratio of transitions to transversions (Ts/Tv) is consistently lower in C. elegans mutation accumulation (MA) experiments than in nature, which has been argued to be in part due to increased oxidative stress in the lab environment. Using whole-g… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
(69 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…O1MA lines in both MA line panels have undergone passage for about 250 generations with minimal selection (Joyner-Matos et al 2011; Matsuba et al 2012; Saxena et al 2019; Rajaei et al 2021). To investigate STR mutations in MA lines, we calculated mutation rates for total mutations and three different mutations (deletions, insertions, and substitutions) between the ancestor and each O1MA line (ANC-O1MA) (See Materials and Methods) (fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…O1MA lines in both MA line panels have undergone passage for about 250 generations with minimal selection (Joyner-Matos et al 2011; Matsuba et al 2012; Saxena et al 2019; Rajaei et al 2021). To investigate STR mutations in MA lines, we calculated mutation rates for total mutations and three different mutations (deletions, insertions, and substitutions) between the ancestor and each O1MA line (ANC-O1MA) (See Materials and Methods) (fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, we compared the two alleles of each STR in the O1MA line to the two alleles in the ancestor, respectively, to identify insertion, deletion, substitution, or no mutation. We also obtained the number of generations between the O1MA line and the ancestor from the original studies (Saxena et al 2019; Rajaei et al 2021). The mutation rate (per-allele, per-STR, per-generation) µ for each type of mutation was calculated as m/2nt where m is the number of the mutation, n is the total number of STR sites between the two lines, and t is the number of generations.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, k =1 mutation in nt (67 lines)(250 generations)=16750 meioses, so the 95% confidence interval around U Mrt is (1.53×10 −6 – 3.28×10 −4 /genome/generation). The per-nucleotide mutation rate in these lines is approximately 2.8×10 −9 /generation (Saxena et al 2019; Rajaei et al 2021) and the C. elegans genome is approximately 10 8 bp, resulting in a point estimate of the mutational target of the Mrt phenotype of about 0.02%, and possibly as much as 0.1% of the C. elegans genome.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that one, and only one, MA line has a clear Mrt phenotype, we scrutinized its genome for candidate mutations (Rajaei et al 2021; Supplemental Methods ). Line 578 carries 37 unique base-substitutions, 13 deletions, and four insertions relative to the genome of the progenitor of the N2 MA lines ( Supplemental Table S2 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation