“…The 'high policing tactics' that are often linked to securitisation, and which have become embedded in everyday policing practice, can be experienced by the public, and particularly minority groups, as threatening, humiliating, intrusive and insensitive (see Jonathan-Zamir, Hasisi, and Margalioth 2016, 613-614). Several studies in various contexts have demonstrated how processes of securitisation, and the counter-terrorism policies and practices used in the pursuit of security, can have a discriminatory, stigmatising, marginalising or alienating effect, creating and sustaining 'suspect communities' in the climate of prevailing terrorist threats (see Hickman et al 2007;Brown 2008;Breen Smyth 2009;Pantazis and Pemberton 2009;Spalek 2010Spalek , 2011Awan 2012;Mythen 2012;Mythen, Walklate, and Khan 2013;Ajala 2014;Vermeulen 2014). Certainly, the ethics and morality of securitisation are of interest to scholars, practitioners and the general public (Floyd 2016, 80-82).…”