2007
DOI: 10.1080/13602000701536117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Muslim Communities and Counter-Terror Responses: “Hard” Approaches to Community Engagement in the UK and Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For some young Muslims, apart from disaffection, alienation was said to lead to a variety of responses including an increased inclination to assert a Muslim identity, sometimes to join gangs and in a tiny minority of cases to develop politically radical views (not to be confused with what are referred to as extremist views, see Spalek and Imtoual 2007).…”
Section: Impacts Of Constructing Communities As 'Suspect'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some young Muslims, apart from disaffection, alienation was said to lead to a variety of responses including an increased inclination to assert a Muslim identity, sometimes to join gangs and in a tiny minority of cases to develop politically radical views (not to be confused with what are referred to as extremist views, see Spalek and Imtoual 2007).…”
Section: Impacts Of Constructing Communities As 'Suspect'mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, research pertaining to young Muslims in Western contexts has typically been framed within, or in response to, this discourse (Dunn, Klocker, & Salabay, 2007, p. 565;Poynting & Mason, 2008, p. 237;Mansouri & Wood, 2008, p. 9). This is particularly the case following the events of 9/11, when government policy began to emphasise group accountability; and monitoring of the social activities of certain groups (Spalek & Imtoual, 2007, 2008). This has resulted in an abundance of policies aimed at cultivating social cohesion, the prevention of marginalization and associated negative outcomes (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is an element of "us versus them" thinking on the behalf of non-Muslim Australians, which is tarnishing the social inclusivity and harmony in Australia (Ata, 2015;Hopkins, 2011;Poynting & Mason, 2006). Contrary to the "war on terror" strategy, a softer approach is also being tried, which is more socially inclusive, involves community engagement, and is perceived more favorably by Australian Muslims as they appreciate being actively involved in the safety and wellbeing of their adopted country (Spalek & Imtoual, 2007).…”
Section: Acculturative Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Australian governments, past and present, have tried to curb terrorism through their "war on terror" campaign. This approach has led to surveillance, interrogation, and mandating Muslim leaders and schools to teach "Australian" values (Pratt, 2011;Spalek & Imtoual, 2007). These efforts have been perceived as an intrusion by the state into the religious and cultural affairs of Muslim citizens (Poynting & Mason, 2008) and have increased stress upon them (Michael, 2009).…”
Section: Acculturative Stressmentioning
confidence: 99%