MusicKG: Representations of Sound and Music in the Middle Ages as Linked Open Data

Eyharabide, Victoria; Lully, Vincent; Morel, Florentin

doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33220-4_5

Cited by 2 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Linkage to external linked data resources and types. After enrichment, each entity is enriched with external LD sources (Eyharabide et al, 2019;Gracy, 2015;Oomen et al, 2012). Although authority LD sources including VIAF (http://viaf.org/), Getty Vocabularies (http:// vocab.getty.edu/) and ISNI (https://isni.org/) are the first choice, external LD resources have been expanded from domain-specific to others, including DBpedia (www.dbpedia.org/) and Wikidata (www.wikidata.org/).…”

Section: Outside-in Enrichmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…On the other hand, the degree of LD openness is also distinct from the OPAC or discovery systems. In addition to being download in batches through SPARQL endpoint, LD data sets can be dumped in another way (Eyharabide et al, 2019;Hyvönen, 2012) rather than putting more restrictions or inconvenience on record download in OPAC and discovery system, such as a limited number of records.…”

Section: Othersmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The connected relationships between entities with designated URIs can be regarded as a “following one’s nose” information pathway (Baker et al ., 2011). Through LD aggregation, the same URI-based entity can combine link-in and link-out linkages together (Gracy, 2015), traversing over various sources to automatically build up an information graph or network composed of contextual pathways (Baker et al ., 2011; CLIR, 2011; Ermolaev et al ., 2015; Eyharabide et al ., 2019; Gracy, 2015; Lemmens, 2020; Lynch, 2014; Moi, 2020; Niu, 2016; Styles et al ., 2008; Tillman, 2016; Ullah et al ., 2018; Zeng et al ., 2013). Based on URI-based connections, each entity can assemble diverse contextual information (Ali and Warraich, 2018; Beene et al ., 2020; Hawkins, 2021; Klic et al ., 2018), such as social-document (Lynch, 2014), spatial and temporal (Klic et al ., 2018), biographical (Larson et al ., 2014), intellectual (ICA Experts Group on Archival Description, 2019) and conceptual context (Beene et al ., 2020; Ermolaev et al ., 2015; Oomen et al ., 2012).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…However, LD catalogues also offer a similar faceted function with a different approach. In the LD environment, URIs are used as a basis to offer either faceted limitations in filtering the search results (Alvite-Díez, 2021; Eyharabide et al ., 2019) or faceted browsing to retrieve LD through semantic structure defined by ontology (Hyvönen, 2012).…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…(2018) Linkage to external LD sources and online servicesEyharabide et al (2019),Gracy (2015),Oomen et al (2012),Ullah et al (2018) Aggregation of knowledge contexts into knowledge graphsBaker et al (2011), CLIR (2011), Ermolaev et al (2015,Eyharabide et al (2019),Gracy (2015),Moi (2020),Lemmens (2020), Lynch (2014),Niu (2016), Styles et al (2008), Ullah et al (2018), Zeng et al (2013) URI-based link discovery Ali and Warraich (2018), Cole et al (2013), Hallo et al (2016), Marjit et al (2013) Representation and query of LD relationship Ali and Warraich (2018), Alvite-Díez (2021), Douglas et al (2018), Gonzales (2014), Hawkins (2021), Klic et al (2018), Niu (2016), Oomen et al (2012), Styles et al (2008) URI-based serendipitous discovery Gracy (2015), Hawkins (2021), Hyvönen (2012), Lemmens (2020), Niu (2016) Keyword recommendation Alvite-Díez (2021), Cole et al (2013), Hyvönen (2012), Niu (2016) Faceted limitation and browsing Alvite-Díez (2021), Eyharabide et al (2019), Hyvönen (2012) Visualization Gracy (2015), Hawkins (2021), Hyvönen (2012), Lynch (2014), Niu (2016), Pitti et al (2015), Wildenhaus (2019) Openness of data Alvite-Díez (2021), Eyharabide et al (2019), Hyvönen (2012) Source: Author's own work EL 41,5 intellectual works, as well as publishers and persons and publishers and places explicitly.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

An investigation of linked data catalogue features in libraries, archives, and museums: a checklist approach

Chen

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose In this study, the distinctive functional features of linked data (LD) catalogues were investigated to contrast with existing online public access catalogues (OPACs) and discovery systems using a checklist approach. The checklist was derived from a literature review and is composed of 10 items as follows: self-descriptive and dynamic content for resource description, linkage to external LD sources and online services, aggregation of knowledge contexts into knowledge graphs (KGs), URI-based link discovery, representation and query of LD relationships, URI-based serendipitous discovery, keyword recommendation, faceted limitation and browsing, visualization and openness of data. Design/methodology/approach Ten functional features derived from the literature were checked against existing LD catalogues offered by libraries, archives and museums (LAMs). The LD catalogues were regarded as qualified subjects if they offered functional features that were distinct from current OPACs and discovery systems through URI-based enrichment and aggregation from various LD sources. In addition to individual organizations, LD union catalogues were also included. However, LD hubs, such as ISNI, OCLC WorldCat Entities, VIAF and Wikidata, were excluded. In total, six LD catalogues from LAMs were selected as subjects for examination. Findings First, LD catalogues provide similar KG information through URI combination, and KGs also facilitate information serendipity, including social-document, intellectual, conceptual, spatial and temporal contexts and networks of corporate bodies, persons and families (CPFs). Second, LD catalogues have transformed the “seek first and browse later” paradigm into a “seek or browse” paradigm by refreshing the browsing function of traditional card catalogues with preview and new options to facilitate LD identification and discovery. Third, LD catalogues have refined keyword recommendation with the addition of the following fields: person’s title, CPF relationships, entity type and LD source. Lastly, a virtual union LD catalogue is offered. Research limitations/implications The proposed checklist revealed the unique/improved functional features of LD catalogues, allowing further investigation and comparison. More cases from the fields of medicine, engineering science and so on will be required to make revisions to fine-tune the proposed checklist approach. Originality/value To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first study to propose a checklist of functional features for LD catalogues and examine what the results and features of LD catalogues have achieved and are supported by from ontologies across LAMs. The findings suggest that LD provides a viable alternative to catalogues. The proposed checklist and results pave the way for the future development of LD catalogues and next-generation catalogues and also provide a basis for the future study of LD catalogues from other fields to refine the proposed checklist.

show abstract

Section: Outside-in Enrichmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Othersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

An investigation of linked data catalogue features in libraries, archives, and museums: a checklist approach

Chen

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Archives, linked data and the digital humanities: increasing access to digitised and born-digital archives via the semantic web

Hawkins

2021

Arch Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mass digitisation and the exponential growth of born-digital archives over the past two decades have resulted in an enormous volume of archives and archival data being available digitally. This has produced a valuable but under-utilised source of large-scale digital data ripe for interrogation by scholars and practitioners in the Digital Humanities. However, current digitisation approaches fall short of the requirements of digital humanists for structured, integrated, interoperable, and interrogable data. Linked Data provides a viable means of producing such data, creating machine-readable archival data suited to analysis using digital humanities research methods. While a growing body of archival scholarship and praxis has explored Linked Data, its potential to open up digitised and born-digital archives to the Digital Humanities is under-examined. This article approaches Archival Linked Data from the perspective of the Digital Humanities, extrapolating from both archival and digital humanities Linked Data scholarship to identify the benefits to digital humanists of the production and provision of access to Archival Linked Data. It will consider some of the current barriers preventing digital humanists from being able to experience the benefits of Archival Linked Data evidenced, and to fully utilise archives which have been made available digitally. The article argues for increased collaboration between the two disciplines, challenges individuals and institutions to engage with Linked Data, and suggests the incorporation of AI and low-barrier tools such as Wikidata into the Linked Data production workflow in order to scale up the production of Archival Linked Data as a means of increasing access to and utilisation of digitised and born-digital archives.

show abstract

MusicKG: Representations of Sound and Music in the Middle Ages as Linked Open Data

Cited by 2 publications

References 5 publications

An investigation of linked data catalogue features in libraries, archives, and museums: a checklist approach

An investigation of linked data catalogue features in libraries, archives, and museums: a checklist approach

Archives, linked data and the digital humanities: increasing access to digitised and born-digital archives via the semantic web

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About