2013
DOI: 10.1037/a0030454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Musical expectations within chord sequences: Facilitation due to tonal stability without closure effects.

Abstract: Musical priming studies have shown that musical event processing is facihtated for the tonally related, stable tonic (chord, tone) in comparison with less-related, less stable events. However, target events have always been in the final position of the musical sequences, position at which the tonic is the most expected event as it brings closure. Priming data thus contain a confound between tonal stabüity and end-sequence wrap-up processes, comparable with those reported for sentence processing. To investigate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, harmonic expectancy studies generally support a hierarchy of stability (I > V > IV; Bharucha & Krumhansl, 1983; Tillmann, Janata, Birk, & Bharucha, 2008), with more stable chords serving as cognitive reference points , an expression coined by Rosch (1978) for elements that are characterized by their asymmetric temporal relations with less stable elements. To date, further support for increasingly subtle within-key expectancy violations has been found for I vs. V (Tillmann et al, 2003, 2008; Tillmann & Marmel, 2013), and I vs. vi in harmonic contexts (Kim, Kim, & Chung, 2011; Koelsch, Jentschke, Sammler, & Mietchen, 2007), and 1ˆ vs. 4ˆ in melodic contexts (Marmel, Tillmann, & Delbé, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Similarly, harmonic expectancy studies generally support a hierarchy of stability (I > V > IV; Bharucha & Krumhansl, 1983; Tillmann, Janata, Birk, & Bharucha, 2008), with more stable chords serving as cognitive reference points , an expression coined by Rosch (1978) for elements that are characterized by their asymmetric temporal relations with less stable elements. To date, further support for increasingly subtle within-key expectancy violations has been found for I vs. V (Tillmann et al, 2003, 2008; Tillmann & Marmel, 2013), and I vs. vi in harmonic contexts (Kim, Kim, & Chung, 2011; Koelsch, Jentschke, Sammler, & Mietchen, 2007), and 1ˆ vs. 4ˆ in melodic contexts (Marmel, Tillmann, & Delbé, 2010).…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Harmonic priming studies have used a dissonance detection task in which the listener must detect the presence of an augmented root or augmented fifth (both highly dissonant chord members in Western music). Tonal context also has small and inconsistent effects on accuracy for this task ( Bigand and Pineau, 1997 ; Tillmann and Marmel, 2013 ), in contrast with robust effects on response time. However, in these tasks, the mistuning can be detected also by the presence of acoustics beats in the waveform of the dissonant interval ( McDermott et al, 2010b ), meaning that the pitch interval itself need not be discriminated by the participants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Accessing these overlearned tonal hierarchies can facilitate pitch processing when the relevant pitches are highly expected within the tonal structure. For various pitch processing tasks, response times are faster for expected than for unexpected chords, based on the preceding harmonic progressions ( Bharucha, 1987 ; Bigand and Pineau, 1997 ; Tillmann et al, 2008 ; Tillmann and Marmel, 2013 ), as well as for notes primed by melodic context ( Marmel et al, 2008 , 2011 ). The mechanism of this facilitation of processing may be either priming of expected pitches, or enhanced perception and representation of important pitches or harmonies within the tonal hierarchy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(e.g. Egermann & McAdams, 2013; Lehne et al, 2014; Meyer, 1956; Sears et al, 2018, 2020; Tillmann & Marmel, 2013), but there have been contradictory results regarding the impact on perceived emotion in the listener. Psychoacoustical similarity and fit of cadences has been tested in Milne (2009b, 2010) and Milne et al (2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%