2011
DOI: 10.1037/a0024700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Musical emotions: Predicting second-by-second subjective feelings of emotion from low-level psychoacoustic features and physiological measurements.

Abstract: We sustain that the structure of affect elicited by music is largely dependent on dynamic temporal patterns in low-level music structural parameters. In support of this claim, we have previously provided evidence that spatiotemporal dynamics in psychoacoustic features resonate with two psychological dimensions of affect underlying judgments of subjective feelings: arousal and valence. In this article we extend our previous investigations in two aspects. First, we focus on the emotions experienced rather than p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
95
4
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
4
95
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One of the main conclusions of this study was that the internal structure of the music played a central role in the induction of the emotions. A recent study confirmed that a significant part of listeners' felt emotions can be predicted by psychoacoustic features (Coutinho & Cangelosi, 2011). The goal of the present study is to extend this line of research by investigating how manipulations of one specific factor of real musical excerpts, i.e., pitch level, affect felt emotions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One of the main conclusions of this study was that the internal structure of the music played a central role in the induction of the emotions. A recent study confirmed that a significant part of listeners' felt emotions can be predicted by psychoacoustic features (Coutinho & Cangelosi, 2011). The goal of the present study is to extend this line of research by investigating how manipulations of one specific factor of real musical excerpts, i.e., pitch level, affect felt emotions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Assuming a positive relationship between perceived and felt emotions (Evans & Schubert, 2008), we predicted that musical excerpts with high pitch level would induce more positive valence than musical excerpts with low pitch level (Coutinho & Cangelosi 2009, 2011Gundlach, 1935;Hevner, 1937;Kleinen, 1968;Rigg, 1940;Scherer & Oshinsky, 1977;Watson, 1942;Wedin, 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, some findings have indicated that increased arousal (e.g., induced by noise, sound volume, or fear) is associated with longer perceived time intervals (Burle & Casini, 2001;Grommet, DroitVolet, Gil, Hemmes, Baker, & Brown, 2011;Miró, Cano, Espinosa-Fernández, & Buela-Casal, 2003;Noulhiane, Mella, Samson, Ragot, & Pouthas, 2007;Ozel, Larue, & Dosseville, 2004;Wearden, 2008). In addition to widely used subjective measures of arousal, heart rate is frequently reported as being a reliable physiological indicator (Coutinho & Cangelosi, 2011;Coventry & Hudson, 2001;Sforza, Jouny, & Ibanez, 2000;Thayer, 1970;Vianna & Tranel, 2006;Wulfert, Roland, Hartley, Wang, & Franco, 2005). In general, an increase in heart rate is associated with a higher level of arousal, which should in turn lead to longer duration estimates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In real life observation, internal validity can be diminished due to many uncontrollable factors that increase measurement error. On the other hand, mood induction in experimental studies is typically done by creating an artificial situation through presentation of stimuli, such as movie clips (Schaefer, Nils, Sanchez, & Philippot, 2010), pictures (Lang, Bradley, & Cuthbert, 2008), or music (Coutinho & Cangelosi, 2011) that provide a greater degree of experimental control, which gains much in terms of internal validity but loses in terms of external validity: this represents an important shortcoming in comparison to those conducted with diary experience sampling method.…”
Section: Running Head: Individual Differences In Emotion Elicitationmentioning
confidence: 99%