Abstract:The introduction sketches the book’s theoretical framework and trajectory,
outlining its rationale and aim. I introduce the notions of meaningfulness
and atmospheres and position them vis-à-vis Pacific Islander and
specifically, Palauan ontologies.
“…Atmospheres as half‐things thereby intermingle with felt‐bodies, provoking meaningful stirrings that stand in a relation of qualitative similarity to the integral Gestalten through which such half‐things present themselves. To return to the topic of sound, music, and voice, an emerging focus in work on atmospheres (Abels, 2013, 2022; Eisenlohr, 2018; Riedel & Torvinen 2020), therefore can only be sonic instead of merely acoustic atmospheres. The sonic as traveling vibratory and energetic phenomena not only exceeds the realm of the audible, but also provides an overall paradigm for the stirrings and suggestions of movement that atmospheres provoke.…”
Section: The Semiotics and Meaningfulness Of Sensory Holism: Sound An...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent expansion of atmosphere as a concept from philosophy to other academic fields has yielded a steadily growing literature, including for example, in anthropology (Bille, 2019; Eisenlohr, 2018; Peterson, 2021), in geography (Anderson, 2009; Edensor, 2012; Hasse, 2012, McCormack, 2018), architecture (Zumthor, 2006), anthropology and media studies (Pink & Sumartojo, 2019), music studies (Abels, 2013; 2022; Riedel & Torvinen, 2020), and law (Philoppopoulos‐Mihalopoulos, 2015). The pioneering and voluminous work of Hermann Schmitz appears to be not widely known among anglophone authors who write on atmospheres, but see Philoppopoulos‐Mihalopoulos (2015) and Gandy (2017).…”
In this essay, I introduce an analytic of atmosphere as a way to bridge the gap between the phenomenology of the felt‐body and the anthropology of the senses. This analytic of atmospheres as multisensoriality partially aligns with, but also differs from other anthropological approaches to multisensoriality or the anthropology of the senses. Examining the meaningfulness of atmospheres as spatially extended emotions from a neo‐phenomenological perspective, I argue that the notion of atmosphere offers advantages for understanding sensory cultural practices such as sounding and lighting. The felt dimensions of these practices often escape full qualification by cultural discourses, but are nevertheless deeply meaningful. Further, I explore how such atmospheric meaningfulness is irreducible to particular single sensory modi. Instead, it rests on diffuse and synesthetic kinds of felt‐bodily affectedness with a holistic character. I demonstrate this by way of two ethnographic examples, investigating practices sounding and lighting, respectively, as atmospheric practices.
“…Atmospheres as half‐things thereby intermingle with felt‐bodies, provoking meaningful stirrings that stand in a relation of qualitative similarity to the integral Gestalten through which such half‐things present themselves. To return to the topic of sound, music, and voice, an emerging focus in work on atmospheres (Abels, 2013, 2022; Eisenlohr, 2018; Riedel & Torvinen 2020), therefore can only be sonic instead of merely acoustic atmospheres. The sonic as traveling vibratory and energetic phenomena not only exceeds the realm of the audible, but also provides an overall paradigm for the stirrings and suggestions of movement that atmospheres provoke.…”
Section: The Semiotics and Meaningfulness Of Sensory Holism: Sound An...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent expansion of atmosphere as a concept from philosophy to other academic fields has yielded a steadily growing literature, including for example, in anthropology (Bille, 2019; Eisenlohr, 2018; Peterson, 2021), in geography (Anderson, 2009; Edensor, 2012; Hasse, 2012, McCormack, 2018), architecture (Zumthor, 2006), anthropology and media studies (Pink & Sumartojo, 2019), music studies (Abels, 2013; 2022; Riedel & Torvinen, 2020), and law (Philoppopoulos‐Mihalopoulos, 2015). The pioneering and voluminous work of Hermann Schmitz appears to be not widely known among anglophone authors who write on atmospheres, but see Philoppopoulos‐Mihalopoulos (2015) and Gandy (2017).…”
In this essay, I introduce an analytic of atmosphere as a way to bridge the gap between the phenomenology of the felt‐body and the anthropology of the senses. This analytic of atmospheres as multisensoriality partially aligns with, but also differs from other anthropological approaches to multisensoriality or the anthropology of the senses. Examining the meaningfulness of atmospheres as spatially extended emotions from a neo‐phenomenological perspective, I argue that the notion of atmosphere offers advantages for understanding sensory cultural practices such as sounding and lighting. The felt dimensions of these practices often escape full qualification by cultural discourses, but are nevertheless deeply meaningful. Further, I explore how such atmospheric meaningfulness is irreducible to particular single sensory modi. Instead, it rests on diffuse and synesthetic kinds of felt‐bodily affectedness with a holistic character. I demonstrate this by way of two ethnographic examples, investigating practices sounding and lighting, respectively, as atmospheric practices.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.