2018
DOI: 10.1177/8755123318801064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Music Educators’ Understanding and Opinions of U.S. Copyright Law

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to examine music educators’ understanding and opinions of U.S. copyright law. In-service music educators ( N = 50) completed a web-based questionnaire designed to assess their attitudes toward, knowledge of, and preparation/training for understanding copyright law. Respondents reported generally favorable attitudes toward copyright law. Results also indicated that respondents had a limited understanding of certain aspects of copyright law. These in-service music teachers reported … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…I did not examine statistical indicators of reliability because I analyzed data using only item-level descriptive statistics, rather than inferential analyses. This decision was consistent with authors of recent studies who also reported respondents’ beliefs about their own personal behaviors and did not report measures of reliability (Egger & Springer, 2018; Regier et al, 2020; Silvey et al, 2016; Sims & Cassidy, 2016).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…I did not examine statistical indicators of reliability because I analyzed data using only item-level descriptive statistics, rather than inferential analyses. This decision was consistent with authors of recent studies who also reported respondents’ beliefs about their own personal behaviors and did not report measures of reliability (Egger & Springer, 2018; Regier et al, 2020; Silvey et al, 2016; Sims & Cassidy, 2016).…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Recommendations for questionnaire content included adding (a) “eye contact” to the list of practice behaviors, (b) “Laban gestures” to the list of practice strategies, and (c) open-response items asking participants to reflect on their conducting practice behaviors. Consistent with recent exploratory studies, we did not examine statistical indicators of survey reliability (Egger & Springer, 2019; Silvey et al, 2016; Sims & Cassidy, 2016).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…I chose not to examine statistical indicators of reliability because I felt that respondents would respond truthfully. This decision was consistent with authors of recent studies who also reported respondents' beliefs about their own personal behaviors and did not report measures of reliability (Egger & Springer, 2018;Silvey et al, 2016;Sims & Cassidy, 2015).…”
Section: Survey Constructionsupporting
confidence: 89%