Music education as manipulation – a proposal for playing

Abstract

An important feature of music is its ability to affect people in unpredictable and deep ways. Music has therefore been used to oppress and (mis)lead people by dictatorships, religious leaders and supermarkets amongst others, and to help lure people into acting in ways that are beneficial for the manipulators. Such forms of ethically dubious musical manipulation happen because of the sublime potential of music to do something to people, and in such a way that they have few ways to defend themselves against it. Thus, the power of music is also the reason people seek out the unforeseen affects and effects in their encounters with the arts. Building on a theory of aesthetic communication, and seeking support from Deleuze and Guattari (1994), Dewey (2005) and Spinoza (Spinoza & Lagerberg, 2001), the aim of this article is to propose the term manipulation as a tool in music education or as a vehicle for teachers and researchers to help frame activities in music education as meaningful for aesthetic communication. I argue that manipulation is a necessary component of all art and aesthetic communication, that, despite its usual negative connotations, manipulation is an act that can be used for good or bad purposes, and that music education has a duty to educate pupils in artistic manipulation. Manipulation is considered action, and as such, it is argued that it can take on any value from good to bad depending on the intentions and effects it causes. This article invites a discussion of possible ways of designing music education that revolve around tinkering with aesthetic communication, and wherein desirable manipulation plays a vital role, and outcomes-based curricula are replaced with an alternative more compatible with the arts.

“Music is my life”: Examining the connections between music students’ workload experiences in higher education and meaningful engagement in music

“…Adopting this holistic perspective may encourage teachers to view their music students as complex, bodily, living subjects who are constantly learning and interacting with the world. In doing so, students may gain more meaningful learning experiences (Thorgersen, 2010), which may also lead to more successful outcomes compared with more traditional music teaching and learning approaches (Crawford, 2014).…”

Kulturskolen som inkluderende kraft: Perspektiver fra forskning til forandring

“…Musikskolorna har också fått en del av äran för vad som ofta kallas »det svenska musikundret» -det oproportionerligt stora genomslag som svensk populärmusik har fått de senare decennierna (t.ex. Thorgersen, 2009).…”

Research on the Comparative Development of Modern Popular Music and Traditional Music Culture in Colleges and Universities in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

“…Literature [19] argues that an important characteristic of music and art is the ability to influence people in unpredictable and profound ways, that music education plays an important educational tool in music education, that music education is a necessary part of all artistic and aesthetic communication, that music education is an act that can be used for good or bad purposes, and that music education must educate students in the manipulation of art.…”