“…Such variability in the efficacy of music-based interventions may arise, in part, from the diversity of protocols that underlie MBIs (e.g., self-selected vs. clinician-selected music), the heterogeneity of clinical populations that are targeted by MBIs, and individual differences in the sensitivity to musical features that constitute the intervention (e.g., rhythm, melody, motor-movement, and social interactions during musical experiences) [ 4 , 7 , 8 ]. While research has identified key neural networks that contribute to music processing [ 9 , 10 ], little is known about the underlying neurobiological mechanisms that are specifically engaged by MBIs [ 11 , 12 ], and how aging affects neural responses to musical structure (e.g., rhythm, melody, and harmony) [ 13 ]. However, understanding how MBIs engage the nervous system and the impact of aging on the neural processing of music has important implications for designing and implementing MBIs; understanding the effects of naturalistic music-listening and -making on brain function, cognitive health, and well-being; and explaining individual outcomes following the intervention [ 13 , 14 , 15 ].…”