2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2017.03.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Music and natural sounds in an auditory steady-state response based brain–computer interface to increase user acceptance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
25
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Sugi and colleagues (2018) similarly employed spatially distinct sound sources (six in their case) and optimized the stimulus onset asynchrony for maximal information transfer rate; the optimal SOA was found to be 400–500 ms, which yielded over 85% accuracy when classifying the target sound source vs. all others. Heo and colleagues (2017) utilized piano and violin music, sounds of nature as well as pure tones which were all amplitude modulated at 38 and 42 Hz to elicit auditory steady-state responses. LDA classification of the EEG responses to sounds of nature yielded the highest accuracy (83%), and the authors argue that this due to the acceptance, or pleasantness, of these stimuli compared to the other stimuli in that study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sugi and colleagues (2018) similarly employed spatially distinct sound sources (six in their case) and optimized the stimulus onset asynchrony for maximal information transfer rate; the optimal SOA was found to be 400–500 ms, which yielded over 85% accuracy when classifying the target sound source vs. all others. Heo and colleagues (2017) utilized piano and violin music, sounds of nature as well as pure tones which were all amplitude modulated at 38 and 42 Hz to elicit auditory steady-state responses. LDA classification of the EEG responses to sounds of nature yielded the highest accuracy (83%), and the authors argue that this due to the acceptance, or pleasantness, of these stimuli compared to the other stimuli in that study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the natural sound session, the sounds of water streaming and cicadas singing are normally used. 59 Functional electric stimulation (FES), neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES), biofeedback, bioness, virtual reality, robotics, neuroprosthetics, robotic-assisted gait training (RAGT), tablet applications, as technological achievements, have recently become frequently used adjunctive treatment in inpatient rehabilitation. [60][61][62] "Saebo package" is also very popular choice for rehabilitation.…”
Section: Therapeutic Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, daily usage of tactile BCI is hard because most people do not have tactile stimulators at home (Kaufmann et al, 2013). Thus, there has been an increasing interest towards auditory BCI (aBCI), which mainly uses auditory selective attention (Hill et al, 2004;Kanoh et al, 2008;Nijboer et al, 2008;Furdea et al, 2009;Klobassa et al, 2009;Halder et al, 2010;Schreuder et al, 2010;Higashi et al, 2011;Höhne et al, 2011;Kim et al, 2011;Schreuder et al, 2011;Höhne et al, 2012;Kim et al, 2012;Lopez-Gordo et al, 2012b;Lopez-Gordo et al, 2012a;Käthner et al, 2013;Nakamura et al, 2013;Simon et al, 2014;Kleih et al, 2015;Halder et al, 2016;Zhou et al, 2016;Heo et al, 2017;Kaongoen and Jo, 2017;Jalilpour and Sardouie, 2018;Ogino et al, 2019) or auditory imagery (González et al, 2019) to influence event-related potentials (ERPs) and/or auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs). ASSR is chiefly evoked by listening to amplitude-modulated (AM) tones, and its spectrum has peaks at message frequency (fm) (Picton et al, 2003;Lopez et al, 2009;Tanaka et al, 2013;Tanaka et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In aBCI, lengthening the processing window enhances the classification accuracy, whereas it reduces the speed (Lopez-Gordo et al, 2012a). Also, when users eagerly listen to their interesting stimuli, the classification accuracy (Höhne et al, 2012;Treder et al, 2014;Zhou et al, 2016;Heo et al, 2017) and response amplitude (Kleih et al, 2010) rise. Moreover, rhythmic stimulation modulates the intrinsic neural oscillatory characteristics (Treder et al, 2014;Herrmann et al, 2016) and facilitates keeping focus (Sato et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%